Papers › Vision Models Are More Robust And Fair When Pretrained On Uncurated Images Without Supervision

Vision Models Are More Robust And Fair When Pretrained On Uncurated Images Without Supervision

16 Feb 2022arXiv:2202.08360archive 2025-07-28

Priya Goyal, Quentin Duval, Isaac Seessel, Mathilde Caron, Ishan Misra, Levent Sagun, Armand Joulin, Piotr Bojanowski

Discriminative self-supervised learning allows training models on any random group of internet images, and possibly recover salient information that helps differentiate between the images. Applied to ImageNet, this leads to object centric features that perform on par with supervised features on most object-centric downstream tasks. In this work, we question if using this ability, we can learn any salient and more representative information present in diverse unbounded set of images from across the globe. To do so, we train models on billions of random images without any data pre-processing or prior assumptions about what we want the model to learn. We scale our model size to dense 10 billion parameters to avoid underfitting on a large data size. We extensively study and validate our model performance on over 50 benchmarks including fairness, robustness to distribution shift, geographical diversity, fine grained recognition, image copy detection and many image classification datasets. The resulting model, not only captures well semantic information, it also captures information about artistic style and learns salient information such as geolocations and multilingual word embeddings based on visual content only. More importantly, we discover that such model is more robust, more fair, less harmful and less biased than supervised models or models trained on object centric datasets such as ImageNet.

PaperPDFConference PDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

facebookresearch/vissl officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Action ClassificationAction RecognitionCopy DetectionDomain GeneralizationFairnessFine-Grained Image ClassificationImage ClassificationMeme ClassificationMultilingual Word EmbeddingsObjectOut-of-Distribution GeneralizationSelf-Supervised Image ClassificationSelf-Supervised LearningSemi-Supervised Image ClassificationTraffic Sign RecognitionWord Embeddingsimage-classification

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Action Classification Kinetics-700 SEER (RegNet10B) Top-1 Accuracy 51.9 #34 of 36 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization ImageNet-A SEER (RegNet10B) Top-1 accuracy % 52.7 #18 of 39 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization ImageNet-R SEER (RegNet10B) Top-1 Error Rate 43.9 #19 of 39 Archive leaderboard report
Domain Generalization ImageNet-Sketch SEER (RegNet10B) Top-1 accuracy 45.6 #15 of 20 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Caltech-101 SEER (RegNet10B - linear eval) Accuracy 91.0 #10 of 18 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Caltech-101 SEER (RegNet10B - linear eval) Top-1 Error Rate 9.0% #10 of 18 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification FGVC Aircraft SEER (RegNet10B) Accuracy 54.82% #54 of 57 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Oxford-IIIT Pet Dataset SEER (RegNet10B) Accuracy 85.3% #14 of 15 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification SUN397 SEER (RegNet10B - linear eval) Accuracy 80.0 #2 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Stanford Cars SEER (RegNet10B) Accuracy 68.03% #82 of 83 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CIFAR-10 SEER (RegNet10B) Percentage correct 90 #206 of 265 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CIFAR-100 SEER (RegNet10B) Percentage correct 81.53 #118 of 211 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CLEVR/Count SEER (RegNet10B) Top 1 Accuracy 89.28 #1 of 2 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CLEVR/Count SEER (RegNetY-128GF) Top 1 Accuracy 87.98 #2 of 2 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CLEVR/Dist SEER (RegNet10B) Top 1 Accuracy 74.98 #1 of 2 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CLEVR/Dist SEER (RegNetY-128GF) Top 1 Accuracy 72.67 #2 of 2 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification DTD SEER (RegNet10B - linear eval) Accuracy 80.5 #6 of 11 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification EuroSAT SEER (RegNet10B - linear eval) Accuracy (%) 97.5 #13 of 15 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification Flowers-102 SEER (RegNet10B) Accuracy 96.3 #42 of 52 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification Food-101 SEER (RegNet10B - linear eval) Accuracy (%) 90.3 #4 of 11 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet SEER (RG-10B) Number of params 10000M #200 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet SEER (RG-10B) Top 1 Accuracy 85.8% #200 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet ReaL SEER (RegNet10B) Accuracy 89.8% #22 of 57 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet ReaL SEER (RegNet10B) Params 10000M #22 of 57 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet V2 SEER (RegNet10B) Top 1 Accuracy 76.2 #17 of 33 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification KITTI-Dist SEER (RegNet10B) Top 1 Accuracy 78.34 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification MNIST SEER (RegNet10B) Accuracy 99.42 #40 of 81 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification MNIST SEER (RegNet10B) Percentage error 0.58 #40 of 81 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ObjectNet SEER (RegNet10B) Top-1 Accuracy 60.2 #19 of 106 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification Places205 SEER (RegNet10B - finetuned - 384px) Top 1 Accuracy 69.0 #3 of 15 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification RESISC45 SEER (RegNet10B) Top 1 Accuracy 95.61 #5 of 20 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification RESISC45 SwAV (ResNet50-w5) Top 1 Accuracy 94.73 #8 of 20 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification RESISC45 DINO (DeiT-B/16) Top 1 Accuracy 93.97 #9 of 20 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification RESISC45 MoCo-v3 (ViT-B/16) Top 1 Accuracy 93.35 #11 of 20 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification RESISC45 CLIP (ViT-B/16) Top 1 Accuracy 92.7 #12 of 20 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification RESISC45 DeiT-B/16 Top 1 Accuracy 92.48 #14 of 20 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification RESISC45 SimCLR-v2 (ResNet152-w3 + SK) Top 1 Accuracy 89.77 #15 of 20 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification RESISC45 ResNet50 (ImageNet-supervised) Top 1 Accuracy 88.56 #16 of 20 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification RESISC45 MoCo-v2 (ResNet50) Top 1 Accuracy 85.4 #18 of 20 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification STL-10 SEER (RegNet10B) PARAMS 10000M #12 of 117 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification STL-10 SEER (RegNet10B) Percentage correct 97.3 #12 of 117 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification SVHN SEER (RegNet10B) Percentage error 13.6 #47 of 62 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification iNaturalist 2018 SEER (RegNet10B - finetuned - 384px) Top-1 Accuracy 84.7% #9 of 60 Archive leaderboard report
Meme Classification Hateful Memes SEER (RegNet10B) ROC-AUC 0.734 #15 of 17 Archive leaderboard report
Self-Supervised Image Classification ImageNet SEERv2 Number of Params 10000M #29 of 144 Archive leaderboard report
Self-Supervised Image Classification ImageNet SEERv2 Top 1 Accuracy 79.8% #29 of 144 Archive leaderboard report
Self-Supervised Image Classification ImageNet (finetuned) SEER (Regnet10B) Number of Params 10000M #20 of 65 Archive leaderboard report
Self-Supervised Image Classification ImageNet (finetuned) SEER (Regnet10B) Top 1 Accuracy 85.8% #20 of 65 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Image Classification ImageNet - 1% labeled data SEER (RegNet10B) Top 1 Accuracy 62.4% #35 of 65 Archive leaderboard report
Semi-Supervised Image Classification ImageNet - 10% labeled data SEER (RegNet10B) Top 1 Accuracy 78.8% #15 of 75 Archive leaderboard report
Traffic Sign Recognition GTSRB SEER (RegNet10B) Accuracy 90.71% #5 of 5 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections