Papers › Neural Architecture Transfer

Neural Architecture Transfer

12 May 2020arXiv:2005.05859archive 2025-07-28

Zhichao Lu, Gautam Sreekumar, Erik Goodman, Wolfgang Banzhaf, Kalyanmoy Deb, Vishnu Naresh Boddeti

Neural architecture search (NAS) has emerged as a promising avenue for automatically designing task-specific neural networks. Existing NAS approaches require one complete search for each deployment specification of hardware or objective. This is a computationally impractical endeavor given the potentially large number of application scenarios. In this paper, we propose Neural Architecture Transfer (NAT) to overcome this limitation. NAT is designed to efficiently generate task-specific custom models that are competitive under multiple conflicting objectives. To realize this goal we learn task-specific supernets from which specialized subnets can be sampled without any additional training. The key to our approach is an integrated online transfer learning and many-objective evolutionary search procedure. A pre-trained supernet is iteratively adapted while simultaneously searching for task-specific subnets. We demonstrate the efficacy of NAT on 11 benchmark image classification tasks ranging from large-scale multi-class to small-scale fine-grained datasets. In all cases, including ImageNet, NATNets improve upon the state-of-the-art under mobile settings (≤ 600M Multiply-Adds). Surprisingly, small-scale fine-grained datasets benefit the most from NAT. At the same time, the architecture search and transfer is orders of magnitude more efficient than existing NAS methods. Overall, the experimental evaluation indicates that, across diverse image classification tasks and computational objectives, NAT is an appreciably more effective alternative to conventional transfer learning of fine-tuning weights of an existing network architecture learned on standard datasets. Code is available at https://github.com/human-analysis/neural-architecture-transfer

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2005.05859")

Code

Syntology Ran 0 of 1 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 1 has no recorded run.

By repository: official repository: 1 sample from 1 repository, 0 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

human-analysis/neural-architecture-transfer officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report
awesomelemon/encas mentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

1 sample harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1unverified

Licence: 1 of the 1 sample is pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from human-analysis/neural-architecture-transfer. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

drop_connect human-analysis/neural-architecture-transfer/codebase/networks/natnet.py official repository unverified no licence file found · pointer only · 7028564474e3fefd · report

Tasks

Fine-Grained Image ClassificationImage ClassificationNeural Architecture SearchTransfer Learningimage-classification

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Fine-Grained Image Classification FGVC Aircraft NAT-M4 Accuracy 90.8% #47 of 57 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification FGVC Aircraft NAT-M4 FLOPS 581M #47 of 57 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification FGVC Aircraft NAT-M4 PARAMS 5.3M #47 of 57 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification FGVC Aircraft NAT-M3 Accuracy 90.1% #48 of 57 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification FGVC Aircraft NAT-M3 FLOPS 388M #48 of 57 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification FGVC Aircraft NAT-M3 PARAMS 5.1M #48 of 57 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification FGVC Aircraft NAT-M2 Accuracy 89.0% #50 of 57 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification FGVC Aircraft NAT-M2 FLOPS 235M #50 of 57 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification FGVC Aircraft NAT-M2 PARAMS 3.4M #50 of 57 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification FGVC Aircraft NAT-M1 Accuracy 87.0% #52 of 57 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification FGVC Aircraft NAT-M1 FLOPS 175M #52 of 57 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification FGVC Aircraft NAT-M1 PARAMS 3.2M #52 of 57 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Food-101 NAT-M4 Accuracy 89.4 #11 of 15 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Food-101 NAT-M4 FLOPS 361M #11 of 15 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Food-101 NAT-M4 PARAMS 4.5M #11 of 15 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Food-101 NAT-M3 Accuracy 89.0 #12 of 15 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Food-101 NAT-M3 FLOPS 299M #12 of 15 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Food-101 NAT-M3 PARAMS 3.9M #12 of 15 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Food-101 NAT-M2 Accuracy 88.5 #13 of 15 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Food-101 NAT-M2 FLOPS 266M #13 of 15 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Food-101 NAT-M2 PARAMS 4.1M #13 of 15 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Food-101 NAT-M1 Accuracy 87.4 #14 of 15 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Food-101 NAT-M1 FLOPS 198M #14 of 15 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Food-101 NAT-M1 PARAMS 3.1M #14 of 15 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Oxford 102 Flowers NAT-M4 Accuracy 98.3% #12 of 25 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Oxford 102 Flowers NAT-M4 FLOPS 400M #12 of 25 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Oxford 102 Flowers NAT-M4 PARAMS 4.2M #12 of 25 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Oxford 102 Flowers NAT-M3 Accuracy 98.1% #14 of 25 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Oxford 102 Flowers NAT-M3 FLOPS 250M #14 of 25 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Oxford 102 Flowers NAT-M3 PARAMS 3.7M #14 of 25 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Oxford 102 Flowers NAT-M2 Accuracy 97.9% #18 of 25 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Oxford 102 Flowers NAT-M2 FLOPS 195M #18 of 25 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Oxford 102 Flowers NAT-M2 PARAMS 3.4M #18 of 25 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Oxford 102 Flowers NAT-M1 FLOPS 152M #25 of 25 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Oxford 102 Flowers NAT-M1 PARAMS 3.3M #25 of 25 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Oxford-IIIT Pet Dataset NAT-M1 FLOPS 160M #15 of 15 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Oxford-IIIT Pet Dataset NAT-M1 PARAMS 4.0M #15 of 15 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Oxford-IIIT Pets NAT-M4 Accuracy 94.3 #7 of 19 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Oxford-IIIT Pets NAT-M4 FLOPS 744M #7 of 19 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Oxford-IIIT Pets NAT-M4 PARAMS 8.5M #7 of 19 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Oxford-IIIT Pets NAT-M4 Top-1 Error Rate 5.7% #7 of 19 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Oxford-IIIT Pets NAT-M3 Accuracy 94.1 #8 of 19 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Oxford-IIIT Pets NAT-M3 FLOPS 471M #8 of 19 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Oxford-IIIT Pets NAT-M3 PARAMS 5.7M #8 of 19 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Oxford-IIIT Pets NAT-M3 Top-1 Error Rate 5.9% #8 of 19 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Oxford-IIIT Pets NAT-M2 Accuracy 93.5 #9 of 19 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Oxford-IIIT Pets NAT-M2 FLOPS 306M #9 of 19 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Oxford-IIIT Pets NAT-M2 PARAMS 5.5M #9 of 19 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Oxford-IIIT Pets NAT-M2 Top-1 Error Rate 6.5% #9 of 19 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Stanford Cars NAT-M4 Accuracy 92.9% #68 of 83 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Stanford Cars NAT-M4 FLOPS 369M #68 of 83 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Stanford Cars NAT-M4 PARAMS 3.7M #68 of 83 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Stanford Cars NAT-M3 Accuracy 92.6% #72 of 83 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Stanford Cars NAT-M3 FLOPS 289M #72 of 83 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Stanford Cars NAT-M3 PARAMS 3.5M #72 of 83 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Stanford Cars NAT-M2 Accuracy 92.2% #75 of 83 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Stanford Cars NAT-M2 FLOPS 222M #75 of 83 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Stanford Cars NAT-M2 PARAMS 2.7M #75 of 83 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Stanford Cars NAT-M1 Accuracy 90.9% #77 of 83 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Stanford Cars NAT-M1 FLOPS 165M #77 of 83 Archive leaderboard report
Fine-Grained Image Classification Stanford Cars NAT-M1 PARAMS 2.4M #77 of 83 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CIFAR-10 NAT-M4 Parameters 6.9M #41 of 265 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CIFAR-10 NAT-M4 Percentage correct 98.4 #41 of 265 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CIFAR-10 NAT-M4 Top-1 Accuracy 98.4 #41 of 265 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CIFAR-10 NAT-M3 Parameters 6.2M #49 of 265 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CIFAR-10 NAT-M3 Percentage correct 98.2 #49 of 265 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CIFAR-10 NAT-M3 Top-1 Accuracy 98.2 #49 of 265 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CIFAR-10 NAT-M2 Parameters 4.6M #63 of 265 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CIFAR-10 NAT-M2 Percentage correct 97.9 #63 of 265 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CIFAR-10 NAT-M2 Top-1 Accuracy 97.9 #63 of 265 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CIFAR-10 NAT-M1 Parameters 4.3M #85 of 265 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CIFAR-10 NAT-M1 Percentage correct 97.4 #85 of 265 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CIFAR-10 NAT-M1 Top-1 Accuracy 97.4 #85 of 265 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CIFAR-100 NAT-M4 PARAMS 9.0M #39 of 211 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CIFAR-100 NAT-M4 Percentage correct 88.3 #39 of 211 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CIFAR-100 NAT-M3 PARAMS 7.8M #41 of 211 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CIFAR-100 NAT-M3 Percentage correct 87.7 #41 of 211 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CIFAR-100 NAT-M2 PARAMS 6.4M #43 of 211 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CIFAR-100 NAT-M2 Percentage correct 87.5 #43 of 211 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CIFAR-100 NAT-M1 PARAMS 3.8M #57 of 211 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CIFAR-100 NAT-M1 Percentage correct 86.0 #57 of 211 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CINIC-10 NAT-M3 Accuracy 94.3 #3 of 9 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CINIC-10 NAT-M3 FLOPS 501M #3 of 9 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CINIC-10 NAT-M3 PARAMS 8.1M #3 of 9 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CINIC-10 NAT-M2 Accuracy 94.1 #4 of 9 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CINIC-10 NAT-M2 FLOPS 411M #4 of 9 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CINIC-10 NAT-M2 PARAMS 6.2M #4 of 9 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CINIC-10 NAT-M1 Accuracy 93.4 #5 of 9 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CINIC-10 NAT-M1 FLOPS 317M #5 of 9 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification CINIC-10 NAT-M1 PARAMS 4.6M #5 of 9 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification Flowers-102 NAT-M4 Accuracy 98.3% #26 of 52 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification Flowers-102 NAT-M4 FLOPS 400M #26 of 52 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification Flowers-102 NAT-M4 PARAMS 4.2M #26 of 52 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification Flowers-102 NAT-M3 Accuracy 98.1% #29 of 52 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification Flowers-102 NAT-M3 FLOPS 250M #29 of 52 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification Flowers-102 NAT-M3 PARAMS 3.7M #29 of 52 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification Flowers-102 NAT-M2 Accuracy 97.9% #33 of 52 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification Flowers-102 NAT-M2 FLOPS 195M #33 of 52 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification Flowers-102 NAT-M2 PARAMS 3.4M #33 of 52 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification Flowers-102 NAT-M1 FLOPS 152M #52 of 52 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification Flowers-102 NAT-M1 PARAMS 3.3M #52 of 52 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet NAT-M4 Number of params 9.1M #697 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet NAT-M4 Top 1 Accuracy 80.5% #697 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification STL-10 NAT-M4 FLOPS 573M #10 of 117 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification STL-10 NAT-M4 PARAMS 7.5M #10 of 117 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification STL-10 NAT-M4 Percentage correct 97.9 #10 of 117 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification STL-10 NAT-M3 FLOPS 436M #11 of 117 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification STL-10 NAT-M3 PARAMS 7.5M #11 of 117 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification STL-10 NAT-M3 Percentage correct 97.8 #11 of 117 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification STL-10 NAT-M2 FLOPS 303M #13 of 117 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification STL-10 NAT-M2 PARAMS 5.1M #13 of 117 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification STL-10 NAT-M2 Percentage correct 97.2 #13 of 117 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification STL-10 NAT-M1 FLOPS 240M #15 of 117 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification STL-10 NAT-M1 PARAMS 4.4M #15 of 117 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification STL-10 NAT-M1 Percentage correct 96.7 #15 of 117 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CIFAR-10 NAT-M4 FLOPS 468M #1 of 41 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CIFAR-10 NAT-M4 Parameters 6.9M #1 of 41 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CIFAR-10 NAT-M4 Search Time (GPU days) 1.0 #1 of 41 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CIFAR-10 NAT-M4 Top-1 Error Rate 1.6% #1 of 41 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CIFAR-10 NAT-M3 FLOPS 392M #4 of 41 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CIFAR-10 NAT-M3 Parameters 6.2M #4 of 41 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CIFAR-10 NAT-M3 Search Time (GPU days) 1.0 #4 of 41 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CIFAR-10 NAT-M3 Top-1 Error Rate 1.8% #4 of 41 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CIFAR-10 NAT-M2 FLOPS 291M #8 of 41 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CIFAR-10 NAT-M2 Parameters 4.6M #8 of 41 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CIFAR-10 NAT-M2 Search Time (GPU days) 1.0 #8 of 41 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CIFAR-10 NAT-M2 Top-1 Error Rate 2.1% #8 of 41 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CIFAR-10 NAT-M1 FLOPS 232M #28 of 41 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CIFAR-10 NAT-M1 Parameters 4.3M #28 of 41 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CIFAR-10 NAT-M1 Search Time (GPU days) 1.0 #28 of 41 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CIFAR-10 NAT-M1 Top-1 Error Rate 2.6% #28 of 41 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CIFAR-10 Image Classification NAT-M4 FLOPS 468M #1 of 19 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CIFAR-10 Image Classification NAT-M4 Params 6.9M #1 of 19 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CIFAR-10 Image Classification NAT-M4 Percentage error 1.6 #1 of 19 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CIFAR-10 Image Classification NAT-M3 FLOPS 392M #2 of 19 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CIFAR-10 Image Classification NAT-M3 Params 6.2M #2 of 19 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CIFAR-10 Image Classification NAT-M3 Percentage error 1.8 #2 of 19 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CIFAR-10 Image Classification NAT-M2 FLOPS 291M #7 of 19 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CIFAR-10 Image Classification NAT-M2 Params 4.6M #7 of 19 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CIFAR-10 Image Classification NAT-M2 Percentage error 2.1 #7 of 19 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CIFAR-10 Image Classification NAT-M1 FLOPS 232M #15 of 19 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CIFAR-10 Image Classification NAT-M1 Params 4.3M #15 of 19 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CIFAR-10 Image Classification NAT-M1 Percentage error 2.6 #15 of 19 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CIFAR-100 NAT-M4 FLOPS 796M #2 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CIFAR-100 NAT-M4 PARAMS 9.0M #2 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CIFAR-100 NAT-M4 Percentage Error 11.7 #2 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CIFAR-100 NAT-M3 FLOPS 492M #3 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CIFAR-100 NAT-M3 PARAMS 7.8M #3 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CIFAR-100 NAT-M3 Percentage Error 12.3 #3 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CIFAR-100 NAT-M2 FLOPS 398M #4 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CIFAR-100 NAT-M2 PARAMS 6.4M #4 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CIFAR-100 NAT-M2 Percentage Error 12.5 #4 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CIFAR-100 NAT-M1 FLOPS 261M #6 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CIFAR-100 NAT-M1 PARAMS 3.8M #6 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CIFAR-100 NAT-M1 Percentage Error 14.0 #6 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CINIC-10 NAT-M4 Accuracy (%) 94.8 #1 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CINIC-10 NAT-M4 FLOPS 710M #1 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CINIC-10 NAT-M4 PARAMS 9.1M #1 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CINIC-10 NAT-M3 Accuracy (%) 94.3 #2 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CINIC-10 NAT-M3 FLOPS 501M #2 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CINIC-10 NAT-M3 PARAMS 8.1M #2 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CINIC-10 NAT-M2 Accuracy (%) 94.1 #3 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CINIC-10 NAT-M2 FLOPS 411M #3 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CINIC-10 NAT-M2 PARAMS 6.2M #3 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CINIC-10 NAT-M1 Accuracy (%) 93.4 #4 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CINIC-10 NAT-M1 FLOPS 317M #4 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search CINIC-10 NAT-M1 PARAMS 4.6M #4 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search DTD NAT-M4 Accuracy (%) 79.1 #1 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search DTD NAT-M4 FLOPS 560M #1 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search DTD NAT-M4 PARAMS 6.3M #1 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search DTD NAT-M3 Accuracy (%) 78.4 #2 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search DTD NAT-M3 FLOPS 347M #2 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search DTD NAT-M3 PARAMS 4.1M #2 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search DTD NAT-M2 Accuracy (%) 77.6 #3 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search DTD NAT-M2 FLOPS 297M #3 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search DTD NAT-M2 PARAMS 4.0M #3 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search DTD NAT-M1 Accuracy (%) 76.1 #4 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search DTD NAT-M1 FLOPS 136M #4 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search DTD NAT-M1 PARAMS 2.2M #4 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search FGVC Aircraft NAT-M4 Accuracy (%) 90.8 #1 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search FGVC Aircraft NAT-M4 FLOPS 581M #1 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search FGVC Aircraft NAT-M4 PARAMS 5.3M #1 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search FGVC Aircraft NAT-M3 Accuracy (%) 90.1 #2 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search FGVC Aircraft NAT-M3 FLOPS 388M #2 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search FGVC Aircraft NAT-M3 PARAMS 5.1M #2 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search FGVC Aircraft NAT-M2 Accuracy (%) 89.0 #3 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search FGVC Aircraft NAT-M2 FLOPS 235M #3 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search FGVC Aircraft NAT-M2 PARAMS 3.4M #3 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search FGVC Aircraft NAT-M1 Accuracy (%) 87.0 #4 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search FGVC Aircraft NAT-M1 FLOPS 175M #4 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search FGVC Aircraft NAT-M1 PARAMS 3.2M #4 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Food-101 NAT-M4 Accuracy (%) 89.4 #1 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Food-101 NAT-M4 FLOPS 361M #1 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Food-101 NAT-M4 PARAMS 4.5M #1 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Food-101 NAT-M3 Accuracy (%) 89.0 #2 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Food-101 NAT-M3 FLOPS 299M #2 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Food-101 NAT-M3 PARAMS 3.9M #2 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Food-101 NAT-M2 Accuracy (%) 88.5 #3 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Food-101 NAT-M2 FLOPS 266M #3 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Food-101 NAT-M2 PARAMS 4.1M #3 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Food-101 NAT-M1 Accuracy (%) 87.4 #4 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Food-101 NAT-M1 FLOPS 198M #4 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Food-101 NAT-M1 PARAMS 3.1M #4 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet NAT-M4 Accuracy 80.5 #15 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet NAT-M4 MACs 600M #15 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet NAT-M4 Params 9.1M #15 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet NAT-M4 Top-1 Error Rate 19.5 #15 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet NAT-M3 Accuracy 79.9 #24 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet NAT-M3 MACs 490M #24 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet NAT-M3 Params 9.1M #24 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet NAT-M3 Top-1 Error Rate 20.1 #24 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet NAT-M2 Accuracy 78.6 #44 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet NAT-M2 MACs 312M #44 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet NAT-M2 Params 7.7M #44 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet NAT-M2 Top-1 Error Rate 21.4 #44 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet NAT-M1 Accuracy 77.5 #62 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet NAT-M1 MACs 225M #62 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet NAT-M1 Params 6.0M #62 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search ImageNet NAT-M1 Top-1 Error Rate 22.5 #62 of 135 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Oxford 102 Flowers NAT-M4 Accuracy (%) 98.3 #1 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Oxford 102 Flowers NAT-M4 FLOPS 400M #1 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Oxford 102 Flowers NAT-M4 PARAMS 4.2M #1 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Oxford 102 Flowers NAT-M3 Accuracy (%) 98.1 #2 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Oxford 102 Flowers NAT-M3 FLOPS 250M #2 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Oxford 102 Flowers NAT-M3 PARAMS 3.7M #2 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Oxford 102 Flowers NAT-M2 Accuracy (%) 97.9 #3 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Oxford 102 Flowers NAT-M2 FLOPS 195M #3 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Oxford 102 Flowers NAT-M2 PARAMS 3.4M #3 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Oxford 102 Flowers NAT-M1 Accuracy (%) 97.5 #4 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Oxford 102 Flowers NAT-M1 FLOPS 152M #4 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Oxford 102 Flowers NAT-M1 PARAMS 3.3M #4 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Oxford-IIIT Pet Dataset NAT-M4 Accuracy (%) 94.3 #1 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Oxford-IIIT Pet Dataset NAT-M4 FLOPS 744M #1 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Oxford-IIIT Pet Dataset NAT-M4 PARAMS 8.5M #1 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Oxford-IIIT Pet Dataset NAT-M3 Accuracy (%) 94.1 #2 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Oxford-IIIT Pet Dataset NAT-M3 FLOPS 471M #2 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Oxford-IIIT Pet Dataset NAT-M3 PARAMS 5.7M #2 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Oxford-IIIT Pet Dataset NAT-M2 Accuracy (%) 93.5 #3 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Oxford-IIIT Pet Dataset NAT-M2 FLOPS 306M #3 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Oxford-IIIT Pet Dataset NAT-M2 PARAMS 5.5M #3 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Oxford-IIIT Pet Dataset NAT-M1 Accuracy (%) 91.8 #4 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Oxford-IIIT Pet Dataset NAT-M1 FLOPS 160M #4 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Oxford-IIIT Pet Dataset NAT-M1 PARAMS 4.0M #4 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search STL-10 NAT-M4 Accuracy (%) 97.9 #1 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search STL-10 NAT-M4 FLOPS 573M #1 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search STL-10 NAT-M4 PARAMS 7.5M #1 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search STL-10 NAT-M3 Accuracy (%) 97.8 #2 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search STL-10 NAT-M3 FLOPS 436M #2 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search STL-10 NAT-M3 PARAMS 7.5M #2 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search STL-10 NAT-M2 Accuracy (%) 97.2 #3 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search STL-10 NAT-M2 FLOPS 303M #3 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search STL-10 NAT-M2 PARAMS 5.1M #3 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search STL-10 NAT-M1 Accuracy (%) 96.7 #4 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search STL-10 NAT-M1 FLOPS 240M #4 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search STL-10 NAT-M1 PARAMS 4.4M #4 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Stanford Cars NAT-M4 Accuracy (%) 92.9 #1 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Stanford Cars NAT-M4 FLOPS 369M #1 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Stanford Cars NAT-M4 PARAMS 3.7M #1 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Stanford Cars NAT-M3 Accuracy (%) 92.6 #2 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Stanford Cars NAT-M3 FLOPS 289M #2 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Stanford Cars NAT-M3 PARAMS 3.5M #2 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Stanford Cars NAT-M2 Accuracy (%) 92.2 #3 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Stanford Cars NAT-M2 FLOPS 222M #3 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Stanford Cars NAT-M2 PARAMS 2.7M #3 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Stanford Cars NAT-M1 Accuracy (%) 90.0 #4 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Stanford Cars NAT-M1 FLOPS 165M #4 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Neural Architecture Search Stanford Cars NAT-M1 PARAMS 2.4M #4 of 4 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections