Browse › Computer Vision › Fine-Grained Image Classification › Oxford-IIIT Pets

Fine-Grained Image Classification archive 2025-07-28

Oxford-IIIT Pets Benchmark (Fine-Grained Image Classification)

19 rows 17 with code listed 4 metrics Dataset page

Fine-Grained Image Classification is a task in computer vision where the goal is to classify images into subcategories within a larger category. For example, classifying different species of birds or different types of flowers. This task is considered to be fine-grained because it requires the model to distinguish between subtle differences in visual appearance and patterns, making it more challenging than regular image classification tasks.

The archive carries no text for this table; the description above is the archive's text for the task Fine-Grained Image Classification. archive 2025-07-28

Over time archive 2025-07-28

The chart needs JavaScript; the table below carries every value.

Direction inferred from the metric name, not from the archive: Accuracy (higher is better), FLOPS (lower is better), PARAMS (lower is better). Not inferred (points only, no best-so-far line): Top-1 Error Rate. Points are placed at the row's paper date; 19 of 19 rows carry one.

Results archive 2025-07-28

Archive rows end at the archive snapshot, 2025-07-28: no result published after that date is in this table. Rank is the archive's row order at that snapshot; not re-ranked here. Metric values are the archive's strings. Column headers sort the table in your browser; each row keeps its archive rank.

Paper Code Ran Syntology Report
1 EffNet-L2 (SAM) 97.102.90% – Paper Code 2020 8 of 20 ran · 12 unverified report
2 BiT-L (ResNet) 96.623.38% – Paper Code 2019 3 of 10 ran · 7 unverified report
3 µ2Net+ (ViT-L/16) 95.5 – Paper Code 2022 linked, not harvested report
4 µ2Net (ViT-L/16) 95.3 – Paper Code 2022 linked, not harvested report
5 BiT-M (ResNet) 94.475.53% – Paper Code 2019 3 of 10 ran · 7 unverified report
6 Assemble-ResNet-FGVC-50 94.3%5.7 – Paper Code 2020 1 of 11 ran · 10 unverified report
7 NAT-M4 94.35.7%744M8.5M – Paper Code 2020 0 of 1 ran · 1 unverified report
8 NAT-M3 94.15.9%471M5.7M – Paper Code 2020 0 of 1 ran · 1 unverified report
9 NAT-M2 93.56.5%306M5.5M – Paper Code 2020 0 of 1 ran · 1 unverified report
10 ResNet-152-SAM 93.3 – Paper Code 2021 linked, not harvested report
11 ViT-B/16- SAM 93.1 – Paper Code 2021 linked, not harvested report
12 ViT-S/16- SAM 92.9 – Paper Code 2021 linked, not harvested report
13 Mixer-B/16- SAM 92.5 – Paper Code 2021 linked, not harvested report
14 ResNet-50-SAM 91.6 – Paper Code 2021 linked, not harvested report
15 Mixer-S/16- SAM 88.7 – Paper Code 2021 linked, not harvested report
16 SE-ResNet-101 (SAP) 86.011 – Paper – 2024 no code linked report
17 PreResNet-101 85.5897 – Paper Code 2023 linked, not harvested report
18 ResNet-101 (ideal number of groups) 77.076 – Paper – 2023 no code linked report
19 ViT-B/16 6.2% – Paper Code 2020 281 of 419 ran · 138 unverified report

All 19 rows shown. 19 link to a paper page on this site; 0 are marked as using additional training data in the archive. No GitHub stars are tracked; "Code" is the first repository the archive lists for the row. The archive carries no row tags, review links or community-submitted rows for this table; none are shown. archive 2025-07-28

Syntology Ran reads "N of M ran · U unverified": of the M code samples Syntology harvested from repositories linked to that row's paper (joined by arXiv id), N executed on a synthesized input and the other U = M−N are unverified (harvested, no recorded run). It counts code from repositories linked to that row's paper, not this result: the row's number was not reproduced and nothing here is a correctness claim. The other cell texts mean no graph line for the row: "linked, not harvested" (the archive links code, Syntology has not harvested it), "no code linked" (no code link in the archive), "not matched" (the row's paper URL matched no paper on this site). 8 rows have a graph line, from 5 distinct papers; 5 rows (4 papers) have at least one sample that ran. Counting each paper once: Syntology ran 293 of 461 samples; 168 unverified. Separately, 161 of those 461 are pointer-only (licence): the site points at that code rather than redistributing it, a licence property recorded for ran and unverified samples alike; each cell's tooltip carries the row's own pointer-only count. Read from the graph 2026-09-24. Per-sample status is on the paper page.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections