Papers › EfficientNetV2: Smaller Models and Faster Training
EfficientNetV2: Smaller Models and Faster Training
Mingxing Tan, Quoc V. Le
This paper introduces EfficientNetV2, a new family of convolutional networks that have faster training speed and better parameter efficiency than previous models. To develop this family of models, we use a combination of training-aware neural architecture search and scaling, to jointly optimize training speed and parameter efficiency. The models were searched from the search space enriched with new ops such as Fused-MBConv. Our experiments show that EfficientNetV2 models train much faster than state-of-the-art models while being up to 6.8x smaller. Our training can be further sped up by progressively increasing the image size during training, but it often causes a drop in accuracy. To compensate for this accuracy drop, we propose to adaptively adjust regularization (e.g., dropout and data augmentation) as well, such that we can achieve both fast training and good accuracy. With progressive learning, our EfficientNetV2 significantly outperforms previous models on ImageNet and CIFAR/Cars/Flowers datasets. By pretraining on the same ImageNet21k, our EfficientNetV2 achieves 87.3% top-1 accuracy on ImageNet ILSVRC2012, outperforming the recent ViT by 2.0% accuracy while training 5x-11x faster using the same computing resources. Code will be available at https://github.com/google/automl/tree/master/efficientnetv2.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2104.00298")
Code
Syntology Ran 41 of 79 code samples harvested from 15 repositories linked to this paper; 38 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 10 ran · honoured contract; 5 ran · our draft was wrong; 4 ran · fixture could not drive it; 22 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: official repository: 1 sample from 1 repository, 1 ran; community (archive-listed): 76 samples from 13 repositories, 38 ran; community: 2 samples from 1 repository, 2 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
26 repositories listed; official and paper-mentioned ones first.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
79 samples harvested; 41 ran; 10 honoured the contract we drafted; 38 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 10 of the 79 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from 15 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
5640ec0612debaea · report
e3021018c5f52aca · report
87eea03ed82a58bb · report
9354545acc375b1b · report
2a8679c295eca86e · report
4727c94370c69e97 · report
4f25eeb823c2de8b · report
70b3286546cf6d44 · report
5c4ec70828e49d68 · report
cb2b257652e0c5cc · report
f9ecf91bbb0df74d · report
311f34cd673ace61 · report
acb059769b4a4327 · report
57a73cdb3469e654 · report
020b78c721a6198e · report
2a6675c2cebf02ab · report
b7194f8c7b7e316c · report
eacbe6ee4a26a27f · report
d9cb72304c6ddff3 · report
8ecbf3a8e9175884 · report
547d2d46045ba04f · report
3c00e00b9c6c998f · report
29f99c375893c0a7 · report
933cca1f8110f0cc · report
9bfd0b1a5faef873 · report
e9ed9f7ced6189ee · report
96248e1c8a073860 · report
3b89a9e5b46d66cf · report
82db52dd557154d5 · report
d2941723ae4cc495 · report
e60387e9529f63ff · report
8c25eeaec4c91203 · report
6c7d046d7dd60b22 · report
1a9d7e65e0a9fbc9 · report
f93cb693ac8bb537 · report
167f9f74323c7278 · report
ec08335b5c6ecfc3 · report
b43c2e4c5402cf83 · report
97d77e37b5677cd8 · report
e19de965ff30b13f · report
46312249974aad39 · report
cead257166f9875e · report
17727025309b999a · report
b5e6a1fcfb844a2d · report
317a74053ff408d2 · report
2d5bb8dbdbfbf4d1 · report
aa534eb3198967f2 · report
4d580d4938dce187 · report
c9682cc2131f0a47 · report
5e2c67378c46d21d · report
1473a64f191e86c2 · report
82eb14986b238976 · report
2ae034e0700fa114 · report
dea1a4dc9a146df6 · report
ce725cd28eee3383 · report
e13c85dfb8576aa4 · report
3fa8caaf6d69f294 · report
279ab9885f76b013 · report
177a4abf40724f6e · report
ffc9d7cced6f71fb · report
615dd6b5188585cd · report
5af3c724a0f8260c · report
e460868d0e106ef7 · report
428d01f7470ad87b · report
15be99ad0bcca709 · report
70ced89b3b23f051 · report
d9d9a4a8f00a818e · report
f905c37ee28fdfb6 · report
19efbee201b88cff · report
af3379144cf17adc · report
f3e2d15712198ce4 · report
5c88df91221a8d8c · report
f734bb6fe9d256d2 · report
8d9311e021af04d6 · report
a99f170ebd682af5 · report
615b8fc6facd6894 · report
3e49c5fa4dfff12e · report
4b11257d79964d87 · report
56c266222ed70de4 · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10 | EfficientNetV2-L | Percentage correct | 99.1 | #17 of 265 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10 | EfficientNetV2-M | Percentage correct | 99.0 | #24 of 265 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10 | EfficientNetV2-S | Percentage correct | 98.7 | #31 of 265 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-100 | EfficientNetV2-L | Percentage correct | 92.3 | #13 of 211 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-100 | EfficientNetV2-M | Percentage correct | 92.2 | #14 of 211 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-100 | EfficientNetV2-S | Percentage correct | 91.5 | #19 of 211 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | Flowers-102 | EfficientNetV2-L | Accuracy | 98.8 | #19 of 52 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | Flowers-102 | EfficientNetV2-M | Accuracy | 98.5 | #23 of 52 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | Flowers-102 | EfficientNetV2-S | Accuracy | 97.9 | #31 of 52 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | EfficientNetV2-XL (21k) | GFLOPs | 94 | #97 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | EfficientNetV2-XL (21k) | Number of params | 208M | #97 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | EfficientNetV2-XL (21k) | Top 1 Accuracy | 87.3% | #97 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | EfficientNetV2-L (21k) | GFLOPs | 53 | #122 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | EfficientNetV2-L (21k) | Number of params | 120M | #122 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | EfficientNetV2-L (21k) | Top 1 Accuracy | 86.8% | #122 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | EfficientNetV2-M (21k) | GFLOPs | 24 | #167 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | EfficientNetV2-M (21k) | Number of params | 54M | #167 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | EfficientNetV2-M (21k) | Top 1 Accuracy | 86.2% | #167 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | EfficientNetV2-L | GFLOPs | 53 | #205 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | EfficientNetV2-L | Top 1 Accuracy | 85.7% | #205 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | EfficientNetV2-M | Top 1 Accuracy | 85.1% | #253 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | EfficientNetV2-S (21k) | GFLOPs | 8.8 | #278 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | EfficientNetV2-S (21k) | Number of params | 22M | #278 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | EfficientNetV2-S (21k) | Top 1 Accuracy | 84.9% | #278 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | EfficientNetV2-S | Top 1 Accuracy | 83.9% | #372 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | Stanford Cars | EfficientNetV2-L | Accuracy | 95.1 | #3 of 24 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | Stanford Cars | EfficientNetV2-M | Accuracy | 94.6 | #4 of 24 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | Stanford Cars | EfficientNetV2-S | Accuracy | 93.8 | #8 of 24 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Introduced by this paper: EfficientNetV2
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections