Browse State-of-the-Art › Data-to-Text Generation

Data-to-Text Generation

112 papers with code · 26 benchmarks · 24 datasets archive 2025-07-28

Natural Language Processing

A classic problem in natural-language generation (NLG) involves taking structured data, such as a table, as input, and producing text that adequately and fluently describes this data as output. Unlike machine translation, which aims for complete transduction of the sentence to be translated, this form of NLG is usually taken to require addressing (at least) two separate challenges: what to say, the selection of an appropriate subset of the input data to discuss, and how to say it, the surface realization of a generation.

( Image credit: Data-to-Text Generation with Content Selection and Planning )

Description from the archive archive 2025-07-28.

Benchmarks archive 2025-07-28

26 leaderboard tables shown for this task, 26 with rows (a “benchmark” on this site is a table with at least one row, as on /sota), ordered by row count. “Best model” is the first row in the archive's own order at snapshot; nothing is re-ranked here and metric direction is not recorded in the archive. PwC's Trend sparklines are not in the archive, so that column is omitted. 10 shown of 26 until expanded.

DatasetBest model (first row in archive order)PaperCodeSyntologyCompare
WebNLG (20 rows) Control Prefixes (A1, T5-large) Control Prefixes for Parameter-Efficient Text Generation code — Compare
E2E NLG Challenge (11 rows) S_1^R Pragmatically Informative Text Generation code — Compare
WebNLG Full (8 rows) Control Prefixes (A1, A2, T5-large) Control Prefixes for Parameter-Efficient Text Generation code — Compare
Cleaned E2E NLG Challenge (7 rows) Control Prefixes (T5-large) Control Prefixes for Parameter-Efficient Text Generation code — Compare
RotoWire (6 rows) HierarchicalEncoder + NR + IR Improving Encoder by Auxiliary Supervision Tasks for Table-to-Text... code — Compare
RotoWire (Relation Generation) (6 rows) SeqPlan Data-to-text Generation with Variational Sequential Planning code — Compare
ToTTo (6 rows) T5-3B Text-to-Text Pre-Training for Data-to-Text Tasks code — Compare
XAlign (6 rows) Fact-aware embedding with mT5 XF2T: Cross-lingual Fact-to-Text Generation for Low-Resource Languages — — Compare
DART (5 rows) T5B Baseline FactSpotter: Evaluating the Factual Faithfulness of Graph-to-Text... code — Compare
MULTIWOZ 2.1 (5 rows) T5-Base Text-to-Text Pre-Training for Data-to-Text Tasks code — Compare
RotoWire (Content Ordering) (5 rows) Hierarchical Transformer Encoder + conditional copy A Hierarchical Model for Data-to-Text Generation code — Compare
Rotowire (Content Selection) (5 rows) Hierarchical Transformer Encoder + conditional copy A Hierarchical Model for Data-to-Text Generation code — Compare
MLB Dataset (Relation Generation) (4 rows) SeqPlan Data-to-text Generation with Variational Sequential Planning code — Compare
MLB Dataset (4 rows) SeqPlan Data-to-text Generation with Variational Sequential Planning code — Compare
MLB Dataset (Content Ordering) (4 rows) SeqPlan Data-to-text Generation with Variational Sequential Planning code — Compare
Czech Restaurant NLG (3 rows) binmt Machine Translation Pre-training for Data-to-Text Generation -- A... — — Compare
MLB Dataset (Content Selection) (3 rows) Force-Copy May the Force Be with Your Copy Mechanism: Enhanced... — — Compare
E2E (2 rows) self-mem + new data (random) Self-training from Self-memory in Data-to-text Generation code — Compare
SR11Deep (2 rows) Transition based Deep Input Linearization Transition-Based Deep Input Linearization code — Compare
ViGGO (2 rows) DataTuner_FC Have Your Text and Use It Too! End-to-End Neural Data-to-Text... code — Compare
WebNLG en (2 rows) mBART The GEM Benchmark: Natural Language Generation, its Evaluation and Metrics — — Compare
WebNLG ru (2 rows) mBART The GEM Benchmark: Natural Language Generation, its Evaluation and Metrics — — Compare
AMR3.0 (1 row) StructAdapt Structural Adapters in Pretrained Language Models for AMR-to-text... code — Compare
GenWiki (1 row) T5-large Ontology-Free General-Domain Knowledge Graph-to-Text Generation... code Syntology ran 5 of 7 samples · 2 unverified Compare
WikiOFGraph (1 row) T5-large Ontology-Free General-Domain Knowledge Graph-to-Text Generation... code Syntology ran 5 of 7 samples · 2 unverified Compare
Wikipedia Person and Animal Dataset (1 row) Ours Towards Faithful Neural Table-to-Text Generation with... — — Compare

Syntology column: samples harvested from the paper's repositories and executed on synthesized fixtures; “ran” is not a correctness claim and does not order the table. A dash means no Syntology record for that paper, not a recorded non-run. Read from the graph 2026-09-24.

Libraries

Not in the archive: the export carries no per-task library table, so there is nothing to show at snapshot 2025-07-28.

Datasets archive 2025-07-28

24 datasets whose archive record lists this task, ordered by the archive's paper count.

Subtasks archive 2025-07-28

3 subtasks in the archive's task tree.

Parent tasks archive 2025-07-28

Most implemented papers archive 2025-07-28

30 shown of 112 papers with code (219 tagged with this task in all), ordered by repositories listed in the archive, not by stars (the archive holds no stars, so PwC's “Social” and “Latest” sorts cannot be reproduced). Papers without a page here are shown as plain text.

Syntology lines on 11 of the papers shown; no Syntology record for the others (a paper without an arXiv id cannot be joined to the graph, and absence from the graph layer is not a recorded non-run). “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized fixture, not that the paper's result was reproduced. Read from the graph 2026-09-24.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections