Browse › Computer Vision › Image Generation › ImageNet 64x64
ImageNet 64x64 Benchmark (Image Generation)
Image Generation (synthesis) is the task of generating new images from an existing dataset.
- Unconditional generation refers to generating samples unconditionally from the dataset, i.e. p(y)
- Conditional image generation (subtask) refers to generating samples conditionally from the dataset, based on a label, i.e. p(y|x).
In this section, you can find state-of-the-art leaderboards for unconditional generation. For conditional generation, and other types of image generations, refer to the subtasks.
The archive carries no text for this table; the description above is the archive's text for the task Image Generation. archive 2025-07-28
Over time archive 2025-07-28
The chart needs JavaScript; the table below carries every value.
Direction inferred from the metric name, not from the archive: FID (lower is better), Inception Score (higher is better), KID (lower is better). Not inferred (points only, no best-so-far line): Bits per dim, NFE. Points are placed at the row's paper date; 65 of 65 rows carry one.
Results archive 2025-07-28
Archive rows end at the archive snapshot, 2025-07-28: no result published after that date is in this table. Rank is the archive's row order at that snapshot; not re-ranked here. Metric values are the archive's strings. Column headers sort the table in your browser; each row keeps its archive rank.
| Paper | Code | Ran Syntology | Report | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SIMS | 0.92 | 126 | – | Paper | – | 2024 | no code linked | report | |||
| 2 | EDM2-S+DDO | 0.97 | 63 | – | Paper | Code | 2025 | linked, not harvested | report | |||
| 3 | Uni-Instruct | 1.02 | 1 | – | Paper | – | 2025 | no code linked | report | |||
| 4 | SiDA-EDM | 1.11 | 1 | – | Paper | Code | 2024 | 2 of 3 ran · 1 unverified | report | |||
| 5 | GDD-I | 1.16 | 1 | – | Paper | Code | 2024 | linked, not harvested | report | |||
| 6 | PaGoDA | 1.21 | 1 | 76.47 | – | Paper | Code | 2024 | 15 of 17 ran · 2 unverified | report | ||
| 7 | DisCo-Diff | 1.22 | – | Paper | Code | 2024 | 6 of 6 ran · 0 unverified | report | ||||
| 8 | RIN | 1.23 | – | Paper | Code | 2022 | 21 of 29 ran · 8 unverified | report | ||||
| 9 | GDD | 1.42 | 1 | – | Paper | Code | 2024 | linked, not harvested | report | |||
| 10 | SCT | 1.47 | 2 | – | Paper | Code | 2024 | linked, not harvested | report | |||
| 11 | CDM | 1.48 | – | Paper | – | 2021 | no code linked | report | ||||
| 12 | StyleGAN-XL | 1.51 | 1 | – | Paper | Code | 2022 | 14 of 19 ran · 5 unverified | report | |||
| 13 | SiD | 1.524 | 1 | – | Paper | Code | 2024 | 9 of 15 ran · 6 unverified | report | |||
| 14 | TCM | 1.62 | 2 | – | Paper | – | 2024 | no code linked | report | |||
| 15 | ECM-XL | 1.67 | 2 | – | Paper | Code | 2024 | 2 of 3 ran · 1 unverified | report | |||
| 16 | CAF | 1.69 | 2 | 62.03 | – | Paper | Code | 2024 | 3 of 3 ran · 0 unverified | report | ||
| 17 | CTM | 1.73 | 2 | 64.29 | – | Paper | Code | 2023 | 14 of 18 ran · 4 unverified | report | ||
| 18 | ADM (dropout) | 2.07 | – | Paper | Code | 2021 | 27 of 50 ran · 23 unverified | report | ||||
| 19 | LEGO | 2.16 | 78.7 | – | Paper | Code | 2023 | 11 of 17 ran · 6 unverified | report | |||
| 20 | TarFlow | 2.9 | 2.99 | – | Paper | Code | 2024 | 1 of 4 ran · 3 unverified | report | |||
| 21 | Improved DDPM | 2.92 | 3.53 | – | Paper | Code | 2021 | 9 of 11 ran · 2 unverified | report | |||
| 22 | 2-rectified flow++ (NFE=2) | 3.64 | – | Paper | Code | 2024 | 1 of 1 ran · 0 unverified | report | ||||
| 23 | 2-rectified flow++ (NFE=1) | 4.31 | – | Paper | Code | 2024 | 1 of 1 ran · 0 unverified | report | ||||
| 24 | CD (Diffusion + Distillation, NFE=2) | 4.70 | 2 | – | Paper | Code | 2023 | 28 of 57 ran · 29 unverified | report | |||
| 25 | CD (Diffusion + Distillation, NFE=1) | 6.20 | 1 | – | Paper | Code | 2023 | 28 of 57 ran · 29 unverified | report | |||
| 26 | CT (Direct Generation, NFE=2) | 11.1 | 2 | – | Paper | Code | 2023 | 28 of 57 ran · 29 unverified | report | |||
| 27 | CT (Direct Generation, NFE=1) | 13.0 | 1 | – | Paper | Code | 2023 | 28 of 57 ran · 29 unverified | report | |||
| 28 | FM | 14.45 | 3.31 | – | Paper | Code | 2022 | 1 of 4 ran · 3 unverified | report | |||
| 29 | CLR-GAN | 20.27 | – | Paper | Code | 2024 | linked, not harvested | report | ||||
| 30 | PGMGAN | 21.73 | – | Paper | Code | 2021 | 2 of 3 ran · 1 unverified | report | ||||
| 31 | GLIDE + CLIP + CLS + CLS-FREE | 29.184 | 34.952 | 3.766 | – | Paper | – | 2022 | no code linked | report | ||
| 32 | GLIDE + CLS-FREE | 29.219 | 25.926 | 5.325 | – | Paper | – | 2022 | no code linked | report | ||
| 33 | GLIDE + CLIP | 30.462 | 25.017 | 6.174 | – | Paper | – | 2022 | no code linked | report | ||
| 34 | GLIDE + CLS | 30.871 | 22.077 | – | Paper | – | 2022 | no code linked | report | |||
| 35 | NFDM | 3.2 | – | Paper | Code | 2024 | linked, not harvested | report | ||||
| 36 | BSI | 3.22 | – | Paper | Code | 2025 | linked, not harvested | report | ||||
| 37 | Efficient-VDVAE | 3.30 (different downsampling) | – | Paper | Code | 2022 | linked, not harvested | report | ||||
| 38 | DenseFlow-74-10 | 3.35 (different downsampling) | – | Paper | Code | 2021 | linked, not harvested | report | ||||
| 39 | NDM | 3.35 | – | Paper | – | 2023 | no code linked | report | ||||
| 40 | VDM | 3.40 | – | Paper | Code | 2021 | 29 of 38 ran · 9 unverified | report | ||||
| 41 | Combiner-Axial | 3.42 | – | Paper | Code | 2021 | 1 of 3 ran · 2 unverified | report | ||||
| 42 | Routing Transformer | 3.43 | – | Paper | Code | 2020 | 3 of 3 ran · 0 unverified | report | ||||
| 43 | Sparse Transformer 59M (strided) | 3.44 | – | Paper | Code | 2019 | 5 of 6 ran · 1 unverified | report | ||||
| 44 | MRCNF | 3.44 | – | Paper | Code | 2021 | linked, not harvested | report | ||||
| 45 | Hourglass | 3.44 | – | Paper | Code | 2021 | 2 of 4 ran · 2 unverified | report | ||||
| 46 | Combiner-Mixture | 3.504 | – | Paper | Code | 2021 | 1 of 3 ran · 2 unverified | report | ||||
| 47 | SPN | 3.52 | – | Paper | – | 2018 | no code linked | report | ||||
| 48 | Very Deep VAE | 3.52 | – | Paper | Code | 2020 | 8 of 9 ran · 1 unverified | report | ||||
| 49 | PixelCNN | 3.57 | – | Paper | – | 2016 | no code linked | report | ||||
| 50 | Gated PixelCNN (van den Oord et al., [2016c]) | 3.57 | – | Paper | Code | 2016 | 4 of 14 ran · 10 unverified | report | ||||
| 51 | Performer (12 layers) | 3.636 | – | Paper | Code | 2020 | 9 of 16 ran · 7 unverified | report | ||||
| 52 | Flow++ | 3.69 | – | Paper | Code | 2019 | 0 of 9 ran · 9 unverified | report | ||||
| 53 | MaCow (Var) | 3.69 | – | Paper | Code | 2019 | 0 of 3 ran · 3 unverified | report | ||||
| 54 | Parallel Multiscale | 3.7 | – | Paper | – | 2017 | no code linked | report | ||||
| 55 | MALI | 3.71 | – | Paper | Code | 2021 | 2 of 4 ran · 2 unverified | report | ||||
| 56 | Reformer (12 layers) | 3.710 | – | Paper | Code | 2020 | 6 of 8 ran · 2 unverified | report | ||||
| 57 | Performer (6 layers) | 3.719 | – | Paper | Code | 2020 | 9 of 16 ran · 7 unverified | report | ||||
| 58 | Reformer (6 layers) | 3.740 | – | Paper | Code | 2020 | 6 of 8 ran · 2 unverified | report | ||||
| 59 | MaCow (Unf) | 3.75 | – | Paper | Code | 2019 | 0 of 3 ran · 3 unverified | report | ||||
| 60 | Residual Flow | 3.757 | – | Paper | Code | 2019 | 5 of 8 ran · 3 unverified | report | ||||
| 61 | Glow (Kingma and Dhariwal, 2018) | 3.81 | – | Paper | Code | 2018 | 75 of 129 ran · 54 unverified | report | ||||
| 62 | Axial Transformer (6 layers) | 4.032 | – | Paper | Code | 2019 | 3 of 3 ran · 0 unverified | report | ||||
| 63 | Logsparse (6 layers) | 4.351 | – | Paper | Code | 2019 | linked, not harvested | report | ||||
| 64 | CTM (NFE 1) | 1 | 70.38 | – | Paper | Code | 2023 | 14 of 18 ran · 4 unverified | report | |||
| 65 | GLIDE +CLS | 7.952 | – | Paper | – | 2022 | no code linked | report |
All 65 rows shown. 65 link to a paper page on this site; 0 are marked as using additional training data in the archive. No GitHub stars are tracked; "Code" is the first repository the archive lists for the row. The archive carries no row tags, review links or community-submitted rows for this table; none are shown. archive 2025-07-28
Syntology Ran reads "N of M ran · U unverified": of the M code samples Syntology harvested from repositories linked to that row's paper (joined by arXiv id), N executed on a synthesized input and the other U = M−N are unverified (harvested, no recorded run). It counts code from repositories linked to that row's paper, not this result: the row's number was not reproduced and nothing here is a correctness claim. The other cell texts mean no graph line for the row: "linked, not harvested" (the archive links code, Syntology has not harvested it), "no code linked" (no code link in the archive), "not matched" (the row's paper URL matched no paper on this site). 41 rows have a graph line, from 32 distinct papers; 38 rows (30 papers) have at least one sample that ran. Counting each paper once: Syntology ran 318 of 517 samples; 199 unverified. Separately, 102 of those 517 are pointer-only (licence): the site points at that code rather than redistributing it, a licence property recorded for ran and unverified samples alike; each cell's tooltip carries the row's own pointer-only count. Read from the graph 2026-09-24. Per-sample status is on the paper page.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections