Papers › Consistency Models
Consistency Models
Yang song, Prafulla Dhariwal, Mark Chen, Ilya Sutskever
Diffusion models have significantly advanced the fields of image, audio, and video generation, but they depend on an iterative sampling process that causes slow generation. To overcome this limitation, we propose consistency models, a new family of models that generate high quality samples by directly mapping noise to data. They support fast one-step generation by design, while still allowing multistep sampling to trade compute for sample quality. They also support zero-shot data editing, such as image inpainting, colorization, and super-resolution, without requiring explicit training on these tasks. Consistency models can be trained either by distilling pre-trained diffusion models, or as standalone generative models altogether. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that they outperform existing distillation techniques for diffusion models in one- and few-step sampling, achieving the new state-of-the-art FID of 3.55 on CIFAR-10 and 6.20 on ImageNet 64x64 for one-step generation. When trained in isolation, consistency models become a new family of generative models that can outperform existing one-step, non-adversarial generative models on standard benchmarks such as CIFAR-10, ImageNet 64x64 and LSUN 256x256.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2303.01469")
Code
Syntology Ran 28 of 57 code samples harvested from 7 repositories linked to this paper; 29 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 5 ran · honoured contract; 3 ran · violated contract; 8 ran · our draft was wrong; 2 ran · fixture could not drive it; 10 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: official repository: 23 samples from 1 repository, 10 ran; community (archive-listed): 27 samples from 5 repositories, 15 ran; community: 3 samples from 1 repository, 0 ran; 4 identical to code first harvested elsewhere. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
15 repositories listed; official and paper-mentioned ones first.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
57 samples harvested; 28 ran; 5 honoured the contract we drafted; 29 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 8 of the 57 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from 7 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. Some samples are identical code Syntology first harvested from another repository; for those, this paper's copy is not located and its licence is not recorded. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
8ab9a97df8161f31 · report
cfd76fd0d89574a4 · report
cd33283d615fb3d7 · report
e41367ad14ff58fd · report
e20dd5102da3b050 · report
bcd8b4acab199405 · report
cf2798b666b231ca · report
76313eaf1a6e8f2a · report
64fff1e30802b815 · report
129b804760b3115f · report
ecd0fc28815b65ae · report
fe4eb545bbb728e0 · report
53e1de4e44809249 · report
35ea054532112e53 · report
7d8e408ce7ec5b07 · report
df72d0c85cc7f5ed · report
84423ecf52775c17 · report
00611e9feba0f93d · report
b50e02eda098b1ea · report
0caab2b1bad90636 · report
e515a67f7f32e76d · report
0c6607473a4c4c55 · report
53d5be4fdbcfac23 · report
94e00298a14204fd · report
d94e99bfc711955c · report
f9e4398d47ea4296 · report
8aa58874f24b2a76 · report
0503d7a3c565cab0 · report
1b27854844aa3c28 · report
705aea0955c9050d · report
f1e3f7493aad4745 · report
cabb00ce8f3d2b4d · report
05d51d2b4ba36937 · report
703cead614cf486e · report
161fe8043e5391b7 · report
97baf73b6f52c910 · report
64b2196de5dcf1e5 · report
db077dcd1ca85df7 · report
962837b1727d71b7 · report
c5b94fcc2e72016d · report
6d1af0f005c519b3 · report
b56ce6f9b307e9e5 · report
b9b7422c33b745d9 · report
2e8d0cb0b59bdbd1 · report
9ce7073af820d275 · report
787099a78454d6ac · report
0eb7ad1d36660f2e · report
05252c6abda35d7f · report
9c21b1af91813988 · report
0438be8b93e89bbb · report
9b13a9bca59f4324 · report
78ba2ba17fe3511b · report
841087e80145f348 · report
a05b1d0cf3f508b4 · report
473066ddf62a075a · report
5d181060fa21e0cc · report
a58facb8fe71823a · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image Generation | CIFAR-10 | CT (Direct Generation, NFE=2) | FID | 5.83 | #35 of 78 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Generation | ImageNet 64x64 | CD (Diffusion + Distillation, NFE=2) | FID | 4.70 | #24 of 65 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Generation | ImageNet 64x64 | CD (Diffusion + Distillation, NFE=2) | NFE | 2 | #24 of 65 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Generation | ImageNet 64x64 | CD (Diffusion + Distillation, NFE=1) | FID | 6.20 | #25 of 65 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Generation | ImageNet 64x64 | CD (Diffusion + Distillation, NFE=1) | NFE | 1 | #25 of 65 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Generation | ImageNet 64x64 | CT (Direct Generation, NFE=2) | FID | 11.1 | #26 of 65 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Generation | ImageNet 64x64 | CT (Direct Generation, NFE=2) | NFE | 2 | #26 of 65 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Generation | ImageNet 64x64 | CT (Direct Generation, NFE=1) | FID | 13.0 | #27 of 65 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Generation | ImageNet 64x64 | CT (Direct Generation, NFE=1) | NFE | 1 | #27 of 65 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Introduced by this paper: Consistency Models
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections