Papers › Revisiting a kNN-based Image Classification System with High-capacity Storage
Revisiting a kNN-based Image Classification System with High-capacity Storage
Kengo Nakata, Youyang Ng, Daisuke Miyashita, Asuka Maki, Yu-Chieh Lin, Jun Deguchi
In existing image classification systems that use deep neural networks, the knowledge needed for image classification is implicitly stored in model parameters. If users want to update this knowledge, then they need to fine-tune the model parameters. Moreover, users cannot verify the validity of inference results or evaluate the contribution of knowledge to the results. In this paper, we investigate a system that stores knowledge for image classification, such as image feature maps, labels, and original images, not in model parameters but in external high-capacity storage. Our system refers to the storage like a database when classifying input images. To increase knowledge, our system updates the database instead of fine-tuning model parameters, which avoids catastrophic forgetting in incremental learning scenarios. We revisit a kNN (k-Nearest Neighbor) classifier and employ it in our system. By analyzing the neighborhood samples referred by the kNN algorithm, we can interpret how knowledge learned in the past is used for inference results. Our system achieves 79.8% top-1 accuracy on the ImageNet dataset without fine-tuning model parameters after pretraining, and 90.8% accuracy on the Split CIFAR-100 dataset in the task incremental learning setting.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Continual Learning | Cifar100 (20 tasks) | kNN-CLIP | Average Accuracy | 90.8 | #3 of 9 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10 | kNN-CLIP | Percentage correct | 97.3 | #88 of 265 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-100 | kNN-CLIP | Percentage correct | 81.7 | #115 of 211 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | kNN-CLIP | Top 1 Accuracy | 79.8% | #736 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet ReaL | kNN-CLIP | Accuracy | 84% | #46 of 57 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | STL-10 | kNN-CLIP | Percentage correct | 99.6 | #2 of 117 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Incremental Learning | ImageNet - 10 steps | kNN-CLIP | Average Incremental Accuracy | 85.5 | #1 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Incremental Learning | ImageNet100 - 10 steps | kNN-CLIP | Average Incremental Accuracy | 85.1 | #1 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections