Home › Datasets › task › Lesion Segmentation

Lesion Segmentation datasets

archive 2025-07-28

17 datasets carry the task tag "Lesion Segmentation" (the task itself: Lesion Segmentation), ordered by the archive's paper count. Page 1 of 1: 17 shown of 17. Facet routes are this site's own (the archive records the tag string, not a page).

The archive holds 12,214 dataset rows; 12,172 are listed. 6 are withheld from every listing and count here as vandalised before snapshot (6 with contact-centre spam in the title, 0 with a spam description on a row that has no homepage, no paper and no papers counted; none with more than 1 paper, 0 with a benchmark), listed in withheld.json; 1 listed row carries a vandalised description, withheld on its page. This gate never withholds a row with a homepage or a paper that resolves, and a clean description; the content rules below withhold a row whose name is spam whatever else it carries. The gate is a phrase list: these are the rows it caught, not a claim that the rest is clean. Before that gate, the site's content rules withhold 36 more rows (invite-code, gambling, travel-booking, contact-centre and similar spam in the name or on a row with nothing real behind it); they have no page and are listed in withheld.json.

Filter 51 task tags shown of 3,717, by dataset count; the full filter by modality, task and language is on /datasets

Lesion Segmentation datasets 1–17 of 17

HAM10000 is a dataset of 10000 training images for detecting pigmented skin lesions.
209 papers · 2 benchmarks
ISIC2016 (Lesion Segmentation)
Lesion segmentation data includes the original image, paired with the expert manual tracing of the lesion boundaries in the form of a binary mask.
50 papers · 1 benchmark
The ISIC 2018 dataset was published by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC) as a large-scale dataset of dermoscopy images.
27 papers · 1 benchmark
Head and Neck Tumor Segmentation
26 papers · 0 benchmarks
This dataset has 1,842 images with pixel-level DR-related lesion annotations, and 1,000 images with image-level labels graded by six board-certified ophthalmologists with intra-rater consistency.
20 papers · 0 benchmarks
CoIR (Code Information Retrieval Benchmark)
CoIR (Code Information Retrieval) benchmark, is designed to evaluate code retrieval capabilities.
18 papers · 1 benchmark
The ISIC 2017 dataset was published by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC) as a large-scale dataset of dermoscopy images.
15 papers · 0 benchmarks
The ISIC 2018 dataset was published by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC) as a large-scale dataset of dermoscopy images.
11 papers · 0 benchmarks
The SD-198 dataset contains 198 different diseases from different types of eczema, acne and various cancerous conditions.
11 papers · 0 benchmarks
The increasing incidence of melanoma has recently promoted the development of computer-aided diagnosis systems for the classification of dermoscopic images.
10 papers · 3 benchmarks
Over 1.5K images selected from the public Kaggle DR Detection dataset; Five DR grades (DR0 / DR1 / DR2 / DR3 / DR4), re-labeled by a panel of 45 experienced ophthalmologists; Eight retinal lesion classes, including microaneurysm,…
8 papers · 0 benchmarks
The dataset is maintained by VISION AND IMAGE PROCESSING LAB, University of Waterloo.
8 papers · 3 benchmarks
The ISIC 2018 dataset was published by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC) as a large-scale dataset of dermoscopy images.
6 papers · 0 benchmarks
The ISIC 2017 dataset was published by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC) as a large-scale dataset of dermoscopy images.
5 papers · 0 benchmarks
A whole-body FDG-PET/CT dataset with manually annotated tumor lesions (FDG-PET-CT-Lesions) 1,014 studies (900 patients)
4 papers · 0 benchmarks
The ISIC 2017 dataset was published by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC) as a large-scale dataset of dermoscopy images.
2 papers · 0 benchmarks

Paper counts and descriptions are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28; no citation counts, no stars, no trending. Sorting by "most cited" or "newest" was a live-site feature the archive does not carry.