Browse State-of-the-Art › Robust Object Detection

Robust Object Detection

50 papers with code · 5 benchmarks · 9 datasets archive 2025-07-28

Computer Vision

A Benchmark for the: Robustness of Object Detection Models to Image Corruptions and Distortions

To allow fair comparison of robustness enhancing methods all models have to use a standard ResNet50 backbone because performance strongly scales with backbone capacity. If requested an unrestricted category can be added later.

Benchmark Homepage: https://github.com/bethgelab/robust-detection-benchmark

Metrics:

mPC [AP]: Mean Performance under Corruption [measured in AP]

rPC [%]: Relative Performance under Corruption [measured in %]

Test sets: Coco: val 2017; Pascal VOC: test 2007; Cityscapes: val;

( Image credit: Benchmarking Robustness in Object Detection )

Description from the archive archive 2025-07-28.

Benchmarks archive 2025-07-28

5 leaderboard tables shown for this task, 5 with rows (a “benchmark” on this site is a table with at least one row, as on /sota), ordered by row count. “Best model” is the first row in the archive's own order at snapshot; nothing is re-ranked here and metric direction is not recorded in the archive. PwC's Trend sparklines are not in the archive, so that column is omitted.

DatasetBest model (first row in archive order)PaperCodeSyntologyCompare
Cityscapes (13 rows) FGT (SD-1.5 Backbone) Boosting Domain Generalized and Adaptive Detection with Diffusion... code — Compare
DWD (12 rows) GDD (SD-1.5 Backbone) Generalized Diffusion Detector: Mining Robust Features from... code — Compare
Cityscapes test (2 rows) Faster R-CNN with Stylized Training Data Benchmarking Robustness in Object Detection: Autonomous Driving... code Syntology ran 2 of 5 samples · 3 unverified Compare
COCO (Common Objects in Context) (2 rows) Faster R-CNN with Stylized Training Data Benchmarking Robustness in Object Detection: Autonomous Driving... code Syntology ran 2 of 5 samples · 3 unverified Compare
PASCAL VOC 2007 (2 rows) Faster R-CNN with Stylized Training Data Benchmarking Robustness in Object Detection: Autonomous Driving... code Syntology ran 2 of 5 samples · 3 unverified Compare

Syntology column: samples harvested from the paper's repositories and executed on synthesized fixtures; “ran” is not a correctness claim and does not order the table. A dash means no Syntology record for that paper, not a recorded non-run. Read from the graph 2026-09-24.

Libraries

Not in the archive: the export carries no per-task library table, so there is nothing to show at snapshot 2025-07-28.

Datasets archive 2025-07-28

9 datasets whose archive record lists this task, ordered by the archive's paper count.

Subtasks archive 2025-07-28

No subtask under this task in the archive's task tree.

Parent tasks archive 2025-07-28

Most implemented papers archive 2025-07-28

30 shown of 50 papers with code (90 tagged with this task in all), ordered by repositories listed in the archive, not by stars (the archive holds no stars, so PwC's “Social” and “Latest” sorts cannot be reproduced). Papers without a page here are shown as plain text.

Syntology lines on 12 of the papers shown; no Syntology record for the others (a paper without an arXiv id cannot be joined to the graph, and absence from the graph layer is not a recorded non-run). “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized fixture, not that the paper's result was reproduced. Read from the graph 2026-09-24.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections