Papers › Your Diffusion Model is Secretly a Zero-Shot Classifier
Your Diffusion Model is Secretly a Zero-Shot Classifier
Alexander C. Li, Mihir Prabhudesai, Shivam Duggal, Ellis Brown, Deepak Pathak
The recent wave of large-scale text-to-image diffusion models has dramatically increased our text-based image generation abilities. These models can generate realistic images for a staggering variety of prompts and exhibit impressive compositional generalization abilities. Almost all use cases thus far have solely focused on sampling; however, diffusion models can also provide conditional density estimates, which are useful for tasks beyond image generation. In this paper, we show that the density estimates from large-scale text-to-image diffusion models like Stable Diffusion can be leveraged to perform zero-shot classification without any additional training. Our generative approach to classification, which we call Diffusion Classifier, attains strong results on a variety of benchmarks and outperforms alternative methods of extracting knowledge from diffusion models. Although a gap remains between generative and discriminative approaches on zero-shot recognition tasks, our diffusion-based approach has significantly stronger multimodal compositional reasoning ability than competing discriminative approaches. Finally, we use Diffusion Classifier to extract standard classifiers from class-conditional diffusion models trained on ImageNet. Our models achieve strong classification performance using only weak augmentations and exhibit qualitatively better "effective robustness" to distribution shift. Overall, our results are a step toward using generative over discriminative models for downstream tasks. Results and visualizations at https://diffusion-classifier.github.io/
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2303.16203")
Code
Syntology Ran 2 of 2 code samples harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract; 1 ran · fixture could not drive it.
By repository: official repository: 1 sample from 1 repository, 1 ran; community (archive-listed): 1 sample from 1 repository, 1 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
2 samples harvested; 2 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 1 of the 2 samples is pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
5236fd023ace5c38 · report
9fbea808db47dc66 · report
Tasks
1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Generalization | ImageNet-A | Diffusion Classifier | Top-1 accuracy % | 30.2 | #27 of 39 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Fine-Grained Image Classification | FGVC Aircraft | Diffusion Classifier (zero-shot) | Accuracy | 26.4 | #55 of 57 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10 | Diffusion Classifier (zero-shot) | Percentage correct | 88.5 | #217 of 265 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | Flowers-102 | Diffusion Classifier (zero-shot) | Per-Class Accuracy | 66.3 | #51 of 52 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | Diffusion Classifier | Top 1 Accuracy | 79.1% | #779 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ObjectNet (ImageNet classes) | Diffusion Classifier (zero-shot) | Top 1 Accuracy | 43.4 | #1 of 2 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ObjectNet (ImageNet classes) | Diffusion Classifier | Top 1 Accuracy | 33.9 | #2 of 2 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | Oxford-IIIT Pets | Diffusion Classifier (zero-shot) | Per-Class Accuracy | 87.3 | #6 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | STL-10 | Diffusion Classifier (zero-shot) | Percentage correct | 95.4 | #18 of 117 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Visual Reasoning | Winoground | Diffusion Classifier (zero-shot) | Text Score | 34.00 | #56 of 114 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Zero-Shot Transfer Image Classification | Food-101 | Diffusion Classifier (zero-shot) | Top 1 Accuracy | 77.7 | #5 of 5 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Zero-Shot Transfer Image Classification | ImageNet | Diffusion Classifier (zero-shot) | Accuracy (Private) | 61.4 | #20 of 23 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections