Papers › Prompt Learning via Meta-Regularization

Prompt Learning via Meta-Regularization

1 Apr 2024CVPR 2024 1arXiv:2404.00851archive 2025-07-28

Jinyoung Park, Juyeon Ko, Hyunwoo J. Kim

Pre-trained vision-language models have shown impressive success on various computer vision tasks with their zero-shot generalizability. Recently, prompt learning approaches have been explored to efficiently and effectively adapt the vision-language models to a variety of downstream tasks. However, most existing prompt learning methods suffer from task overfitting since the general knowledge of the pre-trained vision language models is forgotten while the prompts are finetuned on a small data set from a specific target task. To address this issue, we propose a Prompt Meta-Regularization (ProMetaR) to improve the generalizability of prompt learning for vision-language models. Specifically, ProMetaR meta-learns both the regularizer and the soft prompts to harness the task-specific knowledge from the downstream tasks and task-agnostic general knowledge from the vision-language models. Further, ProMetaR augments the task to generate multiple virtual tasks to alleviate the meta-overfitting. In addition, we provide the analysis to comprehend how ProMetaR improves the generalizability of prompt tuning in the perspective of the gradient alignment. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that our ProMetaR improves the generalizability of conventional prompt learning methods under base-to-base/base-to-new and domain generalization settings. The code of ProMetaR is available at https://github.com/mlvlab/ProMetaR.

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2404.00851")

Code

Syntology Ran 4 of 7 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 3 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 3 ran · our draft was wrong; 1 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: official repository: 7 samples from 1 repository, 4 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

mlvlab/prometar officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

7 samples harvested; 4 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 3 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

3ran · our draft was wrong
1ran
3unverified

Licence: 0 of the 7 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from mlvlab/ProMetaR. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

basic_clean mlvlab/ProMetaR/clip/simple_tokenizer.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · 98f385d847636a3e · report
compute_ci95 mlvlab/ProMetaR/parse_test_res.py official repository ran fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · ba26afd892405335 · report
get_pairs mlvlab/ProMetaR/clip/simple_tokenizer.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong MIT (permissive) · d919ae32e5e4e616 · report
whitespace_clean mlvlab/ProMetaR/clip/simple_tokenizer.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · 9542161e9640b858 · report
build_model mlvlab/ProMetaR/clip/model.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 48ac2bd4dcbfb717 · report
gradient_update mlvlab/ProMetaR/trainers/prometar.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · f885244436207070 · report
load mlvlab/ProMetaR/clip/clip.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · fbf8c0143d9c48e3 · report

Tasks

Domain GeneralizationGeneral KnowledgePrompt EngineeringPrompt Learning

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Prompt Engineering Caltech-101 ProMetaR Harmonic mean 96.16 #9 of 14 Archive leaderboard report
Prompt Engineering DTD ProMetaR Harmonic mean 72.31 #6 of 14 Archive leaderboard report
Prompt Engineering EuroSAT ProMetaR Harmonic mean 85.30 #6 of 14 Archive leaderboard report
Prompt Engineering FGVC-Aircraft ProMetaR Harmonic mean 40.25 #7 of 14 Archive leaderboard report
Prompt Engineering Food-101 ProMetaR Harmonic mean 91.34 #4 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Prompt Engineering ImageNet ProMetaR Harmonic mean 74.09 #8 of 15 Archive leaderboard report
Prompt Engineering Oxford 102 Flower ProMetaR Harmonic mean 86.70 #5 of 14 Archive leaderboard report
Prompt Engineering Oxford-IIIT Pet Dataset ProMetaR Harmonic mean 96.49 #8 of 14 Archive leaderboard report
Prompt Engineering SUN397 ProMetaR Harmonic mean 80.82 #8 of 14 Archive leaderboard report
Prompt Engineering Stanford Cars ProMetaR Harmonic mean 76.72 #5 of 14 Archive leaderboard report
Prompt Engineering UCF101 ProMetaR Harmonic mean 83.25 #5 of 14 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

SET

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections