Papers › Contrast with Reconstruct: Contrastive 3D Representation Learning Guided by Generative...

Contrast with Reconstruct: Contrastive 3D Representation Learning Guided by Generative Pretraining

5 Feb 2023arXiv:2302.02318archive 2025-07-28

Zekun Qi, Runpei Dong, Guofan Fan, Zheng Ge, Xiangyu Zhang, Kaisheng Ma, Li Yi

Mainstream 3D representation learning approaches are built upon contrastive or generative modeling pretext tasks, where great improvements in performance on various downstream tasks have been achieved. However, we find these two paradigms have different characteristics: (i) contrastive models are data-hungry that suffer from a representation over-fitting issue; (ii) generative models have a data filling issue that shows inferior data scaling capacity compared to contrastive models. This motivates us to learn 3D representations by sharing the merits of both paradigms, which is non-trivial due to the pattern difference between the two paradigms. In this paper, we propose Contrast with Reconstruct (ReCon) that unifies these two paradigms. ReCon is trained to learn from both generative modeling teachers and single/cross-modal contrastive teachers through ensemble distillation, where the generative student guides the contrastive student. An encoder-decoder style ReCon-block is proposed that transfers knowledge through cross attention with stop-gradient, which avoids pretraining over-fitting and pattern difference issues. ReCon achieves a new state-of-the-art in 3D representation learning, e.g., 91.26% accuracy on ScanObjectNN. Codes have been released at https://github.com/qizekun/ReCon.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2302.02318")

Code

Syntology Ran 2 of 5 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 3 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract; 1 ran · our draft was wrong.

By repository: community (archive-listed): 5 samples from 1 repository, 2 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

qizekun/ReCon officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report
aHapBean/PCP-MAE mentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report
asterisci/point-gcc mentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report
qizekun/vpp mentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report
runpeidong/act mentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

5 samples harvested; 2 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 3 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · honoured contract
1ran · our draft was wrong
3unverified

Licence: 0 of the 5 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from aHapBean/PCP-MAE. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

pc_normalize aHapBean/PCP-MAE/datasets/ModelNetDataset.py community (archive-listed) ran · honoured contract fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · 4783fbece52f500e · report
square_distance aHapBean/PCP-MAE/segmentation/pointnet_util.py community (archive-listed) ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · 74c3fe06cea2f553 · report
farthest_point_sample aHapBean/PCP-MAE/datasets/ModelNetDataset.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · f80066a00e7156a2 · report
get_pos_embed aHapBean/PCP-MAE/models/pos.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · baacb7920bbb61c7 · report
timeit aHapBean/PCP-MAE/segmentation/pointnet_util.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · b1227ddb721e2999 · report

Tasks

3D Point Cloud Classification3D Point Cloud Linear ClassificationDecoderFew-Shot 3D Point Cloud ClassificationRepresentation LearningZero-Shot Transfer 3D Point Cloud Classification

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
3D Point Cloud Classification ModelNet40 ReCon Overall Accuracy 94.7 #7 of 111 Archive leaderboard report
3D Point Cloud Classification ScanObjectNN ReCon OBJ-BG (OA) 95.35 #12 of 77 Archive leaderboard report
3D Point Cloud Classification ScanObjectNN ReCon OBJ-ONLY (OA) 93.80 #12 of 77 Archive leaderboard report
3D Point Cloud Classification ScanObjectNN ReCon Overall Accuracy 91.26 #12 of 77 Archive leaderboard report
3D Point Cloud Classification ScanObjectNN ReCon (no voting) OBJ-BG (OA) 95.18 #14 of 77 Archive leaderboard report
3D Point Cloud Classification ScanObjectNN ReCon (no voting) OBJ-ONLY (OA) 93.29 #14 of 77 Archive leaderboard report
3D Point Cloud Classification ScanObjectNN ReCon (no voting) Overall Accuracy 90.63 #14 of 77 Archive leaderboard report
3D Point Cloud Linear Classification ModelNet40 ReCon Overall Accuracy 93.4 #4 of 20 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot 3D Point Cloud Classification ModelNet40 10-way (10-shot) ReCon Overall Accuracy 93.3 #8 of 31 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot 3D Point Cloud Classification ModelNet40 10-way (10-shot) ReCon Standard Deviation 3.9 #8 of 31 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot 3D Point Cloud Classification ModelNet40 10-way (20-shot) ReCon Overall Accuracy 95.8 #6 of 31 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot 3D Point Cloud Classification ModelNet40 10-way (20-shot) ReCon Standard Deviation 3.0 #6 of 31 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot 3D Point Cloud Classification ModelNet40 5-way (10-shot) ReCon Overall Accuracy 97.3 #8 of 30 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot 3D Point Cloud Classification ModelNet40 5-way (10-shot) ReCon Standard Deviation 1.9 #8 of 30 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot 3D Point Cloud Classification ModelNet40 5-way (20-shot) ReCon Overall Accuracy 98.9 #5 of 30 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot 3D Point Cloud Classification ModelNet40 5-way (20-shot) ReCon Standard Deviation 1.2 #5 of 30 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Transfer 3D Point Cloud Classification ModelNet10 ReCon Accuracy (%) 75.6 #1 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Transfer 3D Point Cloud Classification ModelNet40 ReCon Accuracy (%) 61.7 #12 of 16 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Transfer 3D Point Cloud Classification ScanObjectNN ReCon OBJ_BG Accuracy(%) 40.4 #8 of 10 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Transfer 3D Point Cloud Classification ScanObjectNN ReCon OBJ_ONLY Accuracy(%) 43.7 #8 of 10 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Transfer 3D Point Cloud Classification ScanObjectNN ReCon PB_T50_RS Accuracy (%) 30.5 #8 of 10 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections