Papers › AutoMix: Unveiling the Power of Mixup for Stronger Classifiers
AutoMix: Unveiling the Power of Mixup for Stronger Classifiers
Zicheng Liu, Siyuan Li, Di wu, Zihan Liu, ZhiYuan Chen, Lirong Wu, Stan Z. Li
Data mixing augmentation have proved to be effective in improving the generalization ability of deep neural networks. While early methods mix samples by hand-crafted policies (e.g., linear interpolation), recent methods utilize saliency information to match the mixed samples and labels via complex offline optimization. However, there arises a trade-off between precise mixing policies and optimization complexity. To address this challenge, we propose a novel automatic mixup (AutoMix) framework, where the mixup policy is parameterized and serves the ultimate classification goal directly. Specifically, AutoMix reformulates the mixup classification into two sub-tasks (i.e., mixed sample generation and mixup classification) with corresponding sub-networks and solves them in a bi-level optimization framework. For the generation, a learnable lightweight mixup generator, Mix Block, is designed to generate mixed samples by modeling patch-wise relationships under the direct supervision of the corresponding mixed labels. To prevent the degradation and instability of bi-level optimization, we further introduce a momentum pipeline to train AutoMix in an end-to-end manner. Extensive experiments on nine image benchmarks prove the superiority of AutoMix compared with state-of-the-art in various classification scenarios and downstream tasks.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2103.13027")
Code
Syntology Ran 4 of 6 code samples harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper; 2 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · our draft was wrong; 1 ran · fixture could not drive it; 2 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: community (archive-listed): 6 samples from 2 repositories, 4 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
6 samples harvested; 4 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 6 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
0d95e28fac98427f · report
403277d0bfbb477b · report
5ded0879a886f3c4 · report
aa2ba35b3854fa14 · report
30862aa4330bfa12 · report
30d82c52aa52dbd7 · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10 | ResNeXt-50 (AutoMix) | Percentage correct | 97.84 | #68 of 265 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-100 | WRN-28-8 +AutoMix | Percentage correct | 85.16 | #67 of 211 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-100 | ResNeXt-50(32x4d) + AutoMix | Percentage correct | 83.64 | #85 of 211 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | ResNet-101 (AutoMix) | Number of params | 44.6M | #671 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | ResNet-101 (AutoMix) | Top 1 Accuracy | 80.98% | #671 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | ResNet-50 (AutoMix) | Number of params | 25.6M | #767 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | ResNet-50 (AutoMix) | Top 1 Accuracy | 79.25% | #767 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | ResNet-34 (AutoMix) | Number of params | 21.8M | #925 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | ResNet-34 (AutoMix) | Top 1 Accuracy | 76.1% | #925 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | ResNet-18 (AutoMix) | Number of params | 11.7M | #1001 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | ResNet-18 (AutoMix) | Top 1 Accuracy | 72.05% | #1001 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | Places205 | AutoMix (ResNet-50 Supervised) | Top 1 Accuracy | 64.1 | #8 of 15 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | Tiny ImageNet Classification | ResNeXt-50 (AutoMix) | Validation Acc | 70.72% | #15 of 23 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | Tiny ImageNet Classification | ResNet18 (AutoMix) | Validation Acc | 67.33% | #20 of 23 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | iNaturalist 2018 | ResNeXt-101 (AutoMix) | Top-1 Accuracy | 70.49% | #37 of 60 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | iNaturalist 2018 | ResNet-50 (AutoMix) | Top-1 Accuracy | 64.73% | #49 of 60 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections