Methods › General › Self-Supervised Learning › MoBY

MoBY

2 papers tagged archive 2025-07-28

archive 2025-07-28 Description, source and code snippet are the archive's method entry.

MoBY is a self-supervised learning approach for Vision Transformers. The approach is basically a combination of MoCo v2 and BYOL. It inherits the momentum design, the key queue, and the contrastive loss used in MoCo v2, and inherits the asymmetric encoders, asymmetric data augmentations and the momentum scheduler in BYOL. It is named MoBY by picking the first two letters of each method.

The MoBY approach is illustrated in the Figure. There are two encoders: an online encoder and a target encoder. Both two encoders consist of a backbone and a projector head (2-layer MLP), and the online encoder introduces an additional prediction head (2-layer MLP), which makes the two encoders asymmetric. The online encoder is updated by gradients, and the target encoder is a moving average of the online encoder by momentum updating in each training iteration. A gradually increasing momentum updating strategy is applied for on the target encoder: the value of momentum term is gradually increased to 1 during the course of training. The default starting value is $0.99$.

A contrastive loss is applied to learn the representations. Specifically, for an online view q, its contrastive loss is computed as

ℒ_q=-log(exp(q ·k₊ / τ))/(∑ᵢ₌₀ᴷ exp(q ·kᵢ / τ))

where $k_{+}$is the target feature for the other view of the same image; kᵢ is a target feature in the key queue; τ is a temperature term; K is the size of the key queue (4096 by default).

In training, like most Transformer-based methods, the AdamW optimizer is used, in contrast to previous self-supervised learning approaches built on ResNet backbone where usually SGD or LARS [4,8,19] is used. The authors also use a regularization method of asymmetric drop path which proves important for the final performance.

In the experiments, the authors adopt a fixed learning rate of $0.001$ and a fixed weight decay of $0.05$, which performs stably well. Hyper-parameters are tuned of the key queue size K, the starting momentum value of the target branch, the temperature τ, and the drop path rates.

Source: Self-Supervised Learning with Swin Transformers

Papers archive 2025-07-28

2 shown of 2, newest first. Repository counts are the archive's code-links table. A Syntology line states what Syntology ran from that paper's harvested code; it is per sample and not a correctness claim.

Tasks archive 2025-07-28

10 tasks the archive attaches to papers tagged with this method, by distinct papers. A task without a page in the catalog is plain text.

TaskPapers
Self-Supervised Learning2
Active Learning1
Classification1
Image Classification1
Linear evaluation1
Object Detection1
Self-Supervised Image Classification1
Semantic Segmentation1
image-classification1
object-detection1

Usage over time archive 2025-07-28

Papers per year tagged with MoBY: 2021 to 2023, peak 1 1 0 2021: 1 paper 2021 2022: 0 papers 2022 2023: 1 paper 2023
Papers per year the archive tags with this method, by the paper's archive date (2 dated). Bars are counts, not a trend claim.

Components: the archive holds no method-to-method composition, so PwC's Components table cannot be rebuilt; the Papers list carries no Results column for the same reason (the archive does not join its leaderboard rows to method tags).

Categories archive 2025-07-28

Self-Supervised Learning

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections