Home › Datasets › task › Satire Detection

Satire Detection datasets

archive 2025-07-28

3 datasets carry the task tag "Satire Detection" (the task itself: Satire Detection), ordered by the archive's paper count. Page 1 of 1: 3 shown of 3. Facet routes are this site's own (the archive records the tag string, not a page).

The archive holds 12,214 dataset rows; 12,172 are listed. 6 are withheld from every listing and count here as vandalised before snapshot (6 with contact-centre spam in the title, 0 with a spam description on a row that has no homepage, no paper and no papers counted; none with more than 1 paper, 0 with a benchmark), listed in withheld.json; 1 listed row carries a vandalised description, withheld on its page. This gate never withholds a row with a homepage or a paper that resolves, and a clean description; the content rules below withhold a row whose name is spam whatever else it carries. The gate is a phrase list: these are the rows it caught, not a claim that the rest is clean. Before that gate, the site's content rules withhold 36 more rows (invite-code, gambling, travel-booking, contact-centre and similar spam in the name or on a row with nothing real behind it); they have no page and are listed in withheld.json.

Filter 51 task tags shown of 3,717, by dataset count; the full filter by modality, task and language is on /datasets

Satire Detection datasets 1–3 of 3

SaRoCo is a dataset for detecting satire in Romanian news containing 55,608 news articles from multiple real and satirical news sources, of which 27,980 are regular and 27,628 satirical news reports.
3 papers · 0 benchmarks
YesBut Dataset (https://yesbut-dataset.github.io) Understanding satire and humor is a challenging task for even current Vision-Language models.
1 paper · 0 benchmarks
CIDII Dataset (Correct Information and Disinformation about Islamic Issues)
The CIDII dataset is a binary classification, consisting of two classes of correct information and disinformation related to Islamic issues.
0 papers · 0 benchmarks

Paper counts and descriptions are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28; no citation counts, no stars, no trending. Sorting by "most cited" or "newest" was a live-site feature the archive does not carry.