Home › Datasets › task › Formal Logic

Formal Logic datasets

archive 2025-07-28

3 datasets carry the task tag "Formal Logic" (the task itself: Formal Logic), ordered by the archive's paper count. Page 1 of 1: 3 shown of 3. Facet routes are this site's own (the archive records the tag string, not a page).

The archive holds 12,214 dataset rows; 12,172 are listed. 6 are withheld from every listing and count here as vandalised before snapshot (6 with contact-centre spam in the title, 0 with a spam description on a row that has no homepage, no paper and no papers counted; none with more than 1 paper, 0 with a benchmark), listed in withheld.json; 1 listed row carries a vandalised description, withheld on its page. This gate never withholds a row with a homepage or a paper that resolves, and a clean description; the content rules below withhold a row whose name is spam whatever else it carries. The gate is a phrase list: these are the rows it caught, not a claim that the rest is clean. Before that gate, the site's content rules withhold 36 more rows (invite-code, gambling, travel-booking, contact-centre and similar spam in the name or on a row with nothing real behind it); they have no page and are listed in withheld.json.

Filter 51 task tags shown of 3,717, by dataset count; the full filter by modality, task and language is on /datasets

Formal Logic datasets 1–3 of 3

BIG-bench (Beyond the Imitation Game Benchmark)
The Beyond the Imitation Game Benchmark (BIG-bench) is a collaborative benchmark intended to probe large language models and extrapolate their future capabilities.
349 papers · 121 benchmarks
We generate epistemic reasoning problems using modal logic to target theory of mind (tom) in natural language processing models.
4 papers · 0 benchmarks
This dataset tests the capabilities of language models to correctly capture the meaning of words denoting probabilities (WEP, also called verbal probabilities), e.g.
1 paper · 0 benchmarks

Paper counts and descriptions are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28; no citation counts, no stars, no trending. Sorting by "most cited" or "newest" was a live-site feature the archive does not carry.