Browse State-of-the-Art › Scientific Results Extraction
Scientific Results Extraction
5 papers with code · 2 benchmarks · 4 datasets archive 2025-07-28
Scientific results extraction is the task of extracting relevant result information (e.g., in the case of Machine learning performance results: task, dataset, metric name, metric value) from the scientific literature.
Description from the archive archive 2025-07-28.
Benchmarks archive 2025-07-28
2 leaderboard tables shown for this task, 2 with rows (a “benchmark” on this site is a table with at least one row, as on /sota), ordered by row count. “Best model” is the first row in the archive's own order at snapshot; nothing is re-ranked here and metric direction is not recorded in the archive. PwC's Trend sparklines are not in the archive, so that column is omitted.
| Dataset | Best model (first row in archive order) | Paper | Code | Syntology | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NLP-TDMS (Exp, arXiv only) (2 rows) | AxCell | AxCell: Automatic Extraction of Results from Machine Learning Papers | code | Syntology ran 0 of 14 samples · 14 unverified | Compare |
| PWC Leaderboards (restricted) (1 row) | AxCell | AxCell: Automatic Extraction of Results from Machine Learning Papers | code | Syntology ran 0 of 14 samples · 14 unverified | Compare |
Syntology column: samples harvested from the paper's repositories and executed on synthesized fixtures; “ran” is not a correctness claim and does not order the table. A dash means no Syntology record for that paper, not a recorded non-run. Read from the graph 2026-09-24.
Libraries
Not in the archive: the export carries no per-task library table, so there is nothing to show at snapshot 2025-07-28.
Datasets archive 2025-07-28
4 datasets whose archive record lists this task, ordered by the archive's paper count.
Subtasks archive 2025-07-28
No subtask under this task in the archive's task tree.
Parent tasks archive 2025-07-28
Most implemented papers archive 2025-07-28
5 shown of 5 papers with code (5 tagged with this task in all), ordered by repositories listed in the archive, not by stars (the archive holds no stars, so PwC's “Social” and “Latest” sorts cannot be reproduced). Papers without a page here are shown as plain text.
-
25 Apr 2022 1 repository listedOur results demonstrate how generative learning can model real-time scientific experimentation to track how it changes through time as the user manipulates it, and how the trained models can be paired with optimisation…
-
31 Aug 2021 1 repository listedIn this regard, the Leaderboards facet of information organization provides an overview on the state-of-the-art by aggregating empirical results from various studies addressing the same research challenge.
-
29 Apr 2020 1 repository listed Syntology ran 0 of 14 samples · 14 unverifiedTracking progress in machine learning has become increasingly difficult with the recent explosion in the number of papers.
-
2 Mar 2020 1 repository listedThe data set, which is made freely available for research purposes, not only can enhance the future evaluation of research paper-based and citation context-based approaches, but also serve as a basis for new ways to…
-
21 Jun 2019 1 repository listed Syntology ran 0 of 1 samples · 1 unverifiedWhile the fast-paced inception of novel tasks and new datasets helps foster active research in a community towards interesting directions, keeping track of the abundance of research activity in different areas on…
Syntology lines on 2 of the papers shown; no Syntology record for the others (a paper without an arXiv id cannot be joined to the graph, and absence from the graph layer is not a recorded non-run). “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized fixture, not that the paper's result was reproduced. Read from the graph 2026-09-24.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections