Browse State-of-the-Art › nlg evaluation
nlg evaluation
31 papers with code · 0 benchmarks · 0 datasets archive 2025-07-28
Evaluate the generated text by NLG (Natural Language Generation) systems, like large language models
Description from the archive archive 2025-07-28.
Benchmarks archive 2025-07-28
No benchmark for this task in the archive.
Libraries
Not in the archive: the export carries no per-task library table, so there is nothing to show at snapshot 2025-07-28.
Datasets archive 2025-07-28
No dataset record in the archive lists this task.
Subtasks archive 2025-07-28
No subtask under this task in the archive's task tree.
Most implemented papers archive 2025-07-28
30 shown of 31 papers with code (71 tagged with this task in all), ordered by repositories listed in the archive, not by stars (the archive holds no stars, so PwC's “Social” and “Latest” sorts cannot be reproduced). Papers without a page here are shown as plain text.
-
15 May 2023 7 repositories listedOur proposed framework provides access: (i) for verifying whether automatic metrics are faithful to human preference, regardless of their correlation level to human; and (ii) for inspecting the strengths and limitations…
-
29 Mar 2023 3 repositories listed Syntology ran 2 of 4 samples · 2 unverifiedIn this work, we present G-Eval, a framework of using large language models with chain-of-thoughts (CoT) and a form-filling paradigm, to assess the quality of NLG outputs.
-
19 Feb 2024 2 repositories listed Syntology ran 3 of 8 samples · 5 unverifiedSome prior work has shown that LLMs perform well in NLG evaluation for different tasks.
-
24 May 2023 2 repositories listedMost research about natural language generation (NLG) relies on evaluation benchmarks with limited references for a sample, which may result in poor correlations with human judgements.
-
13 Oct 2022 2 repositories listed Syntology ran 0 of 1 samples · 1 unverifiedWe re-frame NLG evaluation as a Boolean Question Answering (QA) task, and by guiding the model with different questions, we can use one evaluator to evaluate from multiple dimensions.
-
14 Mar 2025 1 repository listedLarge Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated great potential as evaluators of NLG systems, allowing for high-quality, reference-free, and multi-aspect assessments.
-
22 Oct 2024 1 repository listedFurthermore, we propose three perspectives that reflect the capability of meta-evaluation: discriminative power, ranking consistency, and sensitivity to score granularity.
-
26 Jun 2024 1 repository listed Syntology ran 5 of 5 samples · 0 unverifiedThe evaluation of natural language generation (NLG) tasks is a significant and longstanding research area.
-
12 Jun 2024 1 repository listed Syntology ran 0 of 1 samples · 1 unverified · 1 pointer-only (licence)Human evaluation is viewed as a reliable evaluation method for NLG which is expensive and time-consuming.
-
12 Jun 2024 1 repository listedHuman evaluation serves as the gold standard for assessing the quality of Natural Language Generation (NLG) systems.
-
23 May 2024 1 repository listedSpecifically, inspired by the recent success of large language models (LLMs) in text generation and evaluation, we adopt strong LLMs as both the data generator and gold evaluator.
-
16 May 2024 1 repository listedIn this work, we propose DEBATE, an NLG evaluation framework based on multi-agent scoring system augmented with a concept of Devil's Advocate.
-
18 Feb 2024 1 repository listed Syntology ran 5 of 5 samples · 0 unverifiedEvaluation of opinion summaries using conventional reference-based metrics rarely provides a holistic evaluation and has been shown to have a relatively low correlation with human judgments.
-
13 Jan 2024 1 repository listedIn the rapidly evolving domain of Natural Language Generation (NLG) evaluation, introducing Large Language Models (LLMs) has opened new avenues for assessing generated content quality, e.
-
9 Jan 2024 1 repository listedThe evaluation of Natural Language Generation (NLG) models has gained increased attention, urging the development of metrics that evaluate various aspects of generated text.
-
6 Aug 2023 1 repository listedTo address this issue, we propose to utilize \textit{multiple references} to enhance the consistency between these metrics and human evaluations.
-
15 Jul 2023 1 repository listed Syntology ran 3 of 3 samples · 0 unverified · 3 pointer-only (licence)Current developments in large language models (LLMs) have enabled impressive zero-shot capabilities across various natural language tasks.
-
13 Jul 2023 1 repository listedExisting evaluation metrics for natural language generation (NLG) tasks face the challenges on generalization ability and interpretability.
-
24 May 2023 1 repository listed Syntology ran 1 of 1 samples · 0 unverified · 1 pointer-only (licence)We address a fundamental challenge in Natural Language Generation (NLG) model evaluation -- the design and evaluation of evaluation metrics.
-
7 Mar 2023 1 repository listedIn detail, we regard ChatGPT as a human evaluator and give task-specific (e.
-
7 Mar 2023 1 repository listedHuman speakers can generate descriptions of perceptual concepts, abstracted from the instance-level.
-
4 Nov 2022 1 repository listedUsing the CLSE's entities and a small number of human translations, we create a linguistically representative NLG evaluation benchmark in three languages: French (high-resource), Marathi (low-resource), and Russian…
-
10 Oct 2022 1 repository listedIs it possible to build a general and automatic natural language generation (NLG) evaluation metric?
-
20 Sep 2022 1 repository listedIn this work, we provide a comprehensive evaluation of efficiency for MT evaluation metrics.
-
13 May 2022 1 repository listedPrecisely assessing the progress in natural language generation (NLG) tasks is challenging, and human evaluation to establish a preference in a model's output over another is often necessary.
-
16 Apr 2022 1 repository listedFor multilingual sequence-to-sequence pretrained language models (multilingual Seq2Seq PLMs), e.
-
11 Mar 2022 1 repository listedIn this work, we introduce Active Evaluation, a framework to efficiently identify the top-ranked system by actively choosing system pairs for comparison using dueling bandit algorithms.
-
14 Sep 2021 1 repository listed Syntology ran 0 of 5 samples · 5 unverifiedBased on the nature of information change from input to output, we classify NLG tasks into compression (e.
-
13 Sep 2021 1 repository listedNatural Language Generation (NLG) evaluation is a multifaceted task requiring assessment of multiple desirable criteria, e.
-
15 Mar 2021 1 repository listedAs transparency becomes key for robotics and AI, it will be necessary to evaluate the methods through which transparency is provided, including automatically generated natural language (NL) explanations.
Syntology lines on 9 of the papers shown; no Syntology record for the others (a paper without an arXiv id cannot be joined to the graph, and absence from the graph layer is not a recorded non-run). “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized fixture, not that the paper's result was reproduced. Read from the graph 2026-09-24.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections