Browse › Natural Language Processing › Linguistic Acceptability › CoLA

Linguistic Acceptability archive 2025-07-28

CoLA Benchmark (Linguistic Acceptability)

43 rows 35 with code listed 2 metrics Dataset page

Linguistic Acceptability is the task of determining whether a sentence is grammatical or ungrammatical.

Image Source: Warstadt et al

The archive carries no text for this table; the description above is the archive's text for the task Linguistic Acceptability. archive 2025-07-28

Over time archive 2025-07-28

The chart needs JavaScript; the table below carries every value.

Direction inferred from the metric name, not from the archive: Accuracy (higher is better). Not inferred (points only, no best-so-far line): MCC. Points are placed at the row's paper date; 42 of 43 rows carry one.

Results archive 2025-07-28

Archive rows end at the archive snapshot, 2025-07-28: no result published after that date is in this table. Rank is the archive's row order at that snapshot; not re-ranked here. Metric values are the archive's strings. Column headers sort the table in your browser; each row keeps its archive rank.

Paper Code Ran Syntology Report
1 En-BERT + TDA + PCA 88.6% – Paper Code 2022 linked, not harvested report
2 BERT+TDA 88.2%0.726 – Paper Code 2023 linked, not harvested report
3 RoBERTa+TDA 87.3%0.695 – Paper Code 2023 linked, not harvested report
4 deberta-v3-base+tasksource 87.15% – Paper Code 2023 3 of 4 ran · 1 unverified report
5 RoBERTa-large 355M + Entailment as Few-shot Learner 86.4% – Paper Code 2021 1 of 3 ran · 2 unverified report
6 LTG-BERT-base 98M 82.7 – Paper – 2023 no code linked report
7 ELC-BERT-base 98M 82.6 – Paper – 2023 no code linked report
8 En-BERT + TDA 82.1%0.565 – Paper Code 2022 linked, not harvested report
9 FNet-Large 78% – Paper Code 2021 2 of 2 ran · 0 unverified report
10 LTG-BERT-small 24M 77.6 – Paper – 2023 no code linked report
11 ELC-BERT-small 24M 76.1 – Paper – 2023 no code linked report
12 T5-11B 70.8% ✓ Paper Code 2019 2 of 31 ran · 29 unverified report
13 StructBERTRoBERTa ensemble 69.2% – Paper – 2019 no code linked report
14 ALBERT 69.1% – Paper Code 2019 46 of 126 ran · 80 unverified report
15 XLNet (single model) 69% – Paper Code 2019 10 of 24 ran · 14 unverified report
16 FLOATER-large 69% – Paper Code 2020 3 of 6 ran · 3 unverified report
17 RoBERTa-large 355M (MLP quantized vector-wise, fine-tuned) 68.6% – Paper Code 2022 2 of 5 ran · 3 unverified report
18 MT-DNN 68.4% – Paper Code 2019 5 of 13 ran · 8 unverified report
19 ELECTRA 68.2% – – – not matched report
20 RoBERTa (ensemble) 67.8% – Paper Code 2019 22 of 48 ran · 26 unverified report
21 PSQ (Chen et al., 2020) 67.5 – Paper Code 2020 1 of 4 ran · 3 unverified report
22 T5-XL 3B 67.1% – Paper Code 2019 2 of 31 ran · 29 unverified report
23 Q-BERT (Shen et al., 2020) 65.1 – Paper – 2019 no code linked report
24 Q8BERT (Zafrir et al., 2019) 65.0 – Paper Code 2019 3 of 11 ran · 8 unverified report
25 SpanBERT 64.3% – Paper Code 2019 3 of 15 ran · 12 unverified report
26 MLM+ del-span+ reorder 64.3% – Paper – 2020 no code linked report
27 ERNIE 2.0 Large 63.5% – Paper Code 2019 0 of 1 ran · 1 unverified report
28 T5-Large 770M 61.2% – Paper Code 2019 2 of 31 ran · 29 unverified report
29 BERT-LARGE 60.5% – Paper Code 2018 204 of 659 ran · 455 unverified report
30 data2vec 60.3% – Paper Code 2022 0 of 6 ran · 6 unverified report
31 RealFormer 59.83% – Paper Code 2020 linked, not harvested report
32 BigBird 58.5% – Paper Code 2020 10 of 15 ran · 5 unverified report
33 24hBERT 57.1 – Paper Code 2021 linked, not harvested report
34 ERNIE 2.0 Base 55.2% – Paper Code 2019 0 of 1 ran · 1 unverified report
35 ERNIE 52.3% – Paper Code 2019 3 of 3 ran · 0 unverified report
36 Charformer-Tall 51.8% – Paper Code 2021 7 of 10 ran · 3 unverified report
37 T5-Base 51.1% – Paper Code 2019 2 of 31 ran · 29 unverified report
38 DistilBERT 66M 49.1% – Paper Code 2019 19 of 27 ran · 8 unverified report
39 SqueezeBERT 46.5% – Paper Code 2020 0 of 1 ran · 1 unverified report
40 TinyBERT-4 14.5M 43.3% – Paper Code 2019 0 of 4 ran · 4 unverified report
41 T5-Small 41.0% – Paper Code 2019 2 of 31 ran · 29 unverified report
42 LM-CPPF RoBERTa-base 14.1% – Paper Code 2023 linked, not harvested report
43 RemBERT 0.6 – Paper Code 2022 linked, not harvested report

All 43 rows shown. 42 link to a paper page on this site; 1 are marked as using additional training data in the archive. No GitHub stars are tracked; "Code" is the first repository the archive lists for the row. The archive carries no row tags, review links or community-submitted rows for this table; none are shown. archive 2025-07-28

Syntology Ran reads "N of M ran · U unverified": of the M code samples Syntology harvested from repositories linked to that row's paper (joined by arXiv id), N executed on a synthesized input and the other U = M−N are unverified (harvested, no recorded run). It counts code from repositories linked to that row's paper, not this result: the row's number was not reproduced and nothing here is a correctness claim. The other cell texts mean no graph line for the row: "linked, not harvested" (the archive links code, Syntology has not harvested it), "no code linked" (no code link in the archive), "not matched" (the row's paper URL matched no paper on this site). 27 rows have a graph line, from 22 distinct papers; 22 rows (18 papers) have at least one sample that ran. Counting each paper once: Syntology ran 346 of 1,018 samples; 672 unverified. Separately, 235 of those 1,018 are pointer-only (licence): the site points at that code rather than redistributing it, a licence property recorded for ran and unverified samples alike; each cell's tooltip carries the row's own pointer-only count. Read from the graph 2026-09-24. Per-sample status is on the paper page.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections