Papers › CLEAR: Contrastive Learning for Sentence Representation
CLEAR: Contrastive Learning for Sentence Representation
Zhuofeng Wu, Sinong Wang, Jiatao Gu, Madian Khabsa, Fei Sun, Hao Ma
Pre-trained language models have proven their unique powers in capturing implicit language features. However, most pre-training approaches focus on the word-level training objective, while sentence-level objectives are rarely studied. In this paper, we propose Contrastive LEArning for sentence Representation (CLEAR), which employs multiple sentence-level augmentation strategies in order to learn a noise-invariant sentence representation. These augmentations include word and span deletion, reordering, and substitution. Furthermore, we investigate the key reasons that make contrastive learning effective through numerous experiments. We observe that different sentence augmentations during pre-training lead to different performance improvements on various downstream tasks. Our approach is shown to outperform multiple existing methods on both SentEval and GLUE benchmarks.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linguistic Acceptability | CoLA | MLM+ del-span+ reorder | Accuracy | 64.3% | #26 of 43 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Natural Language Inference | QNLI | MLM+ subs+ del-span | Accuracy | 93.4% | #21 of 43 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Natural Language Inference | RTE | MLM+ del-span | Accuracy | 79.8% | #37 of 90 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Question Answering | Quora Question Pairs | MLM+ subs+ del-span | Accuracy | 90.3% | #5 of 19 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semantic Textual Similarity | MRPC | MLM+ del-word+ reorder | Accuracy | 90.6% | #11 of 45 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semantic Textual Similarity | STS Benchmark | MLM+ del-word | Pearson Correlation | 0.905 | #18 of 66 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Sentiment Analysis | SST-2 Binary classification | MLM+ del-word+ reorder | Accuracy | 94.5 | #35 of 87 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections