Browse › Natural Language Processing › Common Sense Reasoning › ARC (Easy)
ARC (Easy) Benchmark (Common Sense Reasoning)
Common sense reasoning tasks are intended to require the model to go beyond pattern recognition. Instead, the model should use "common sense" or world knowledge to make inferences.
The archive carries no text for this table; the description above is the archive's text for the task Common Sense Reasoning. archive 2025-07-28
Over time archive 2025-07-28
The chart needs JavaScript; the table below carries every value.
Direction inferred from the metric name, not from the archive: Accuracy (higher is better). Points are placed at the row's paper date; 47 of 47 rows carry one.
Results archive 2025-07-28
Archive rows end at the archive snapshot, 2025-07-28: no result published after that date is in this table. Rank is the archive's row order at that snapshot; not re-ranked here. Metric values are the archive's strings. Column headers sort the table in your browser; each row keeps its archive rank.
| Paper | Code | Ran Syntology | Report | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ST-MoE-32B 269B (fine-tuned) | 95.2 | – | Paper | Code | 2022 | 5 of 5 ran · 0 unverified | report |
| 2 | LLaMA 3 8B+MoSLoRA (fine-tuned) | 90.5 | – | Paper | Code | 2024 | 4 of 6 ran · 2 unverified | report |
| 3 | PaLM 2-L (1-shot) | 89.7 | – | Paper | Code | 2023 | linked, not harvested | report |
| 4 | PaLM 2-M (1-shot) | 88.0 | – | Paper | Code | 2023 | linked, not harvested | report |
| 5 | LLaMA-3 8B + MixLoRA | 86.5 | – | Paper | Code | 2024 | 6 of 11 ran · 5 unverified | report |
| 6 | Camelidae-8×34B | 86.2 | – | Paper | Code | 2024 | linked, not harvested | report |
| 7 | PaLM 2-S (1-shot) | 85.6 | – | Paper | Code | 2023 | linked, not harvested | report |
| 8 | LLaMA 65B + CFG (0-shot) | 84.2 | – | Paper | – | 2023 | no code linked | report |
| 9 | GAL 120B (0-shot) | 83.8 | – | Paper | Code | 2022 | 0 of 2 ran · 2 unverified | report |
| 10 | LLaMA-2 13B + MixLoRA | 83.5 | – | Paper | Code | 2024 | 6 of 11 ran · 5 unverified | report |
| 11 | LLaMA 30B + CFG (0-shot) | 83.2 | – | Paper | – | 2023 | no code linked | report |
| 12 | Mixtral 8x7B (0-shot) | 83.1 | – | Paper | Code | 2024 | 5 of 5 ran · 0 unverified | report |
| 13 | FLAN 137B (few-shot, k=14) | 80.7 | – | Paper | Code | 2021 | 0 of 1 ran · 1 unverified | report |
| 14 | Mistral 7B (0-shot) | 80.5 | – | Paper | Code | 2024 | 5 of 5 ran · 0 unverified | report |
| 15 | LLaMA 33B (0-shot) | 80.0 | – | Paper | Code | 2023 | 26 of 58 ran · 32 unverified | report |
| 16 | Mistral 7B (0-shot) | 80.0 | – | Paper | Code | 2023 | 9 of 11 ran · 2 unverified | report |
| 17 | FLAN 137B (0-shot) | 79.6 | – | Paper | Code | 2021 | 0 of 1 ran · 1 unverified | report |
| 18 | LLaMA 13B + CFG (0-shot) | 79.1 | – | Paper | – | 2023 | no code linked | report |
| 19 | LLaMA 65B (0-shot) | 78.9 | – | Paper | Code | 2023 | 26 of 58 ran · 32 unverified | report |
| 20 | LLaMA-2 7B + MixLoRA | 77.7 | – | Paper | Code | 2024 | 6 of 11 ran · 5 unverified | report |
| 21 | phi-1.5-web 1.3B (0-shot) | 76.1 | – | Paper | Code | 2023 | linked, not harvested | report |
| 22 | BLOOM 176B (1-shot) | 75.93 | – | Paper | Code | 2023 | linked, not harvested | report |
| 23 | ST-MoE-L 4.1B (fine-tuned) | 75.4 | – | Paper | Code | 2022 | 5 of 5 ran · 0 unverified | report |
| 24 | GLaM (64B/64E) (5-shot) | 74.8 | – | Paper | – | 2021 | no code linked | report |
| 25 | LLaMA 13B (0-shot) | 74.8 | – | Paper | Code | 2023 | 26 of 58 ran · 32 unverified | report |
| 26 | Bloomberg GPT 50B (1-shot) | 73.99 | – | Paper | Code | 2023 | linked, not harvested | report |
| 27 | LLaMA 7B (0-shot) | 72.8 | – | Paper | Code | 2023 | 26 of 58 ran · 32 unverified | report |
| 28 | Pythia 12B (5-shot) | 71.5 | – | Paper | Code | 2023 | linked, not harvested | report |
| 29 | OPT 66B (1-shot) | 71.25 | – | Paper | Code | 2023 | linked, not harvested | report |
| 30 | GPT-3 175B (1 shot) | 71.2 | – | Paper | Code | 2020 | 15 of 65 ran · 50 unverified | report |
| 31 | OPT-175B | 71.04 | – | Paper | Code | 2023 | 2 of 12 ran · 10 unverified | report |
| 32 | GPT-NeoX 20B (1-shot) | 70.79 | – | Paper | Code | 2023 | linked, not harvested | report |
| 33 | Pythia 12B (0-shot) | 70.2 | – | Paper | Code | 2023 | linked, not harvested | report |
| 34 | UL2 20B (chain-of-thought + self-consistency) | 69.8 | – | Paper | Code | 2022 | 0 of 16 ran · 16 unverified | report |
| 35 | Mamba-2.8B (0-shot) | 69.7 | – | Paper | Code | 2023 | 18 of 62 ran · 44 unverified | report |
| 36 | SparseGPT 175B (50% sparsity) | 69.65 | – | Paper | Code | 2023 | 2 of 12 ran · 10 unverified | report |
| 37 | GPT-3 (zero-shot) | 68.8 | – | Paper | Code | 2022 | 0 of 2 ran · 2 unverified | report |
| 38 | GPT-3 175B (0-shot) | 68.8 | – | Paper | Code | 2020 | 15 of 65 ran · 50 unverified | report |
| 39 | SparseGPT (175B, 4:8 Sparsity) | 68.35 | – | Paper | Code | 2023 | 2 of 12 ran · 10 unverified | report |
| 40 | GLaM 64B/64E (0-shot) | 68.0 | – | Paper | – | 2021 | no code linked | report |
| 41 | SparseGPT 175B (2:4 sparsity) | 67.08 | – | Paper | Code | 2023 | 2 of 12 ran · 10 unverified | report |
| 42 | LLaMA 7B + CFG (0-shot) | 58.9 | – | Paper | – | 2023 | no code linked | report |
| 43 | BLOOM (5-shot) | 40.7 | – | Paper | Code | 2022 | 0 of 2 ran · 2 unverified | report |
| 44 | UL2 20B (chain-of-thought) | 38.4 | – | Paper | Code | 2022 | 0 of 16 ran · 16 unverified | report |
| 45 | OPT (5-shot) | 37.4 | – | Paper | Code | 2022 | 0 of 2 ran · 2 unverified | report |
| 46 | UL2 20B (0-shot) | 32.2 | – | Paper | Code | 2022 | 0 of 16 ran · 16 unverified | report |
| 47 | OPT 175B (50% Sparsity) | 28.03 | – | Paper | Code | 2023 | 2 of 12 ran · 10 unverified | report |
All 47 rows shown. 47 link to a paper page on this site; 0 are marked as using additional training data in the archive. No GitHub stars are tracked; "Code" is the first repository the archive lists for the row. The archive carries no row tags, review links or community-submitted rows for this table; none are shown. archive 2025-07-28
Syntology Ran reads "N of M ran · U unverified": of the M code samples Syntology harvested from repositories linked to that row's paper (joined by arXiv id), N executed on a synthesized input and the other U = M−N are unverified (harvested, no recorded run). It counts code from repositories linked to that row's paper, not this result: the row's number was not reproduced and nothing here is a correctness claim. The other cell texts mean no graph line for the row: "linked, not harvested" (the archive links code, Syntology has not harvested it), "no code linked" (no code link in the archive), "not matched" (the row's paper URL matched no paper on this site). 30 rows have a graph line, from 12 distinct papers; 21 rows (9 papers) have at least one sample that ran. Counting each paper once: Syntology ran 90 of 254 samples; 164 unverified. Separately, 57 of those 254 are pointer-only (licence): the site points at that code rather than redistributing it, a licence property recorded for ran and unverified samples alike; each cell's tooltip carries the row's own pointer-only count. Read from the graph 2026-09-24. Per-sample status is on the paper page.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections