Papers › Optimal Decay Spectra for Linear Recurrences

Optimal Decay Spectra for Linear Recurrences

8 Apr 2026arXiv:2604.07658added by Syntology

Yang Cao

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Linear recurrent models offer linear-time sequence processing but often suffer from suboptimal long-range memory. We trace this to the decay spectrum: for N channels, random initialization collapses the minimum spectral gap to O(N⁻²), yielding sub-exponential error exp(-Ω(N/logN)); linear spacing avoids collapse but degrades to exp(-O(N/√(T))), practically algebraic over long contexts. We introduce Position-Adaptive Spectral Tapering (PoST), an architecture-agnostic framework combining two mechanisms: (1) Spectral Reparameterization, which structurally enforces geometrically spaced log-decay rates, proven minimax optimal at rate O(exp(-cN/logT)); and (2) Position-Adaptive Scaling, the provably unique mechanism that eliminates the scale mismatch of static spectra (where only Nlogt/logT of N channels are effective at position t) by stretching the spectrum to the actual dependency range, sharpening the rate to O(exp(-cN/logt)). This scaling natively induces fractional invariance: the impulse response becomes scale-free, with channels interpolating between relative and absolute temporal coordinates. PoST integrates into any diagonal linear recurrence without overhead. We instantiate it across Mamba-2, RWKV-7, Gated DeltaNet, Gated Linear Attention, and RetNet. Pre-training at 180M-440M scales shows consistent zero-shot language modeling improvements, significant long-context retrieval gains for Mamba-2 (MQAR and NIAH), and competitive or improved performance across other architectures. Code: https://github.com/SiLifen/PoST.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

5 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 5 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 5 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from SiLifen/PoST. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2604.07658, was issued in April 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections