Papers › SciWalker: Synthesizing Scientific Coding Problems with Operator Graphs and Execution Feedback
SciWalker: Synthesizing Scientific Coding Problems with Operator Graphs and Execution Feedback
Chenxi Li, Wenxuan Zeng, Yun Luo, Fangchen Yu, Peng Ye, Yu Cheng, Jun Zhang
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Improving the scientific coding capabilities of large language models (LLMs) requires high-quality training data. However, such data remain scarce because manually authoring realistic problems is costly and time-consuming, while systematically covering diverse scientific domains and algorithmic combinations remains challenging. To address this, we introduce SciWalker, a framework for synthesizing scientific coding problems through operator-chain sampling and execution feedback. The framework combines scientific library interfaces with operation modes to instantiate operators, organizes them into operator graphs, and samples operator chains as computational workflow cues. Guided by these cues, we adopt LLMs to generate scientifically grounded problem statements, reference solutions, and tests, with failed generations iteratively repaired using execution feedback. By combining structured workflow composition with verification and quality review, SciWalker enables scalable task generation while promoting scientific grounding, computational diversity, and executability. Using this framework, we construct 8,178 high-quality problems spanning 5 scientific domains and 32 subdomains. To evaluate their training utility, we conduct reinforcement learning on Qwen3.5-9B using the GSPO algorithm. This training improves SciCode subproblem accuracy by 9.9 percentage points, from 29.3% to 39.2%, with gains across scientific code generation, code repair, and reasoning benchmarks. The code for SciWalker is available at https://github.com/lichenx1/SciWalker.
In Syntology View this paper on Syntology, its page in Syntology's graph. That page lists the repositories linked to the paper, the abstract and the calls for agents.
Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, on Syntology's MCP service (how to connect):
get_citation_path(paper_1="2609.30054", paper_2="…")with another paper's arXiv id or titleget_concepts_for_paper(arxiv_id="2609.30054")
Code
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Syntology holds the repository link but has not harvested or run code from it.
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2609.30054, was issued in September 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Placed on leaderboards by Syntology Syntology
Syntology's extractor, the model Claude Sonnet 4.5, judged this paper's tables to report on 5 leaderboards (a model's judgement, not a result) and has not placed the paper on any of them: Arithmetic Reasoning · GSM8K (rejected by the independent check); Code Generation · APPS (refused by a rule: the table's column header does not name the leaderboard's metric); Code Generation · HumanEval (rejected by the independent check); Common Sense Reasoning · ARC (Easy) (rejected by the independent check); GSM8K · GSM8K (rejected by the independent check). What is not shown.
Syntology has checked 8,886 of the 9,662 papers on this site that are newer than the archive (for 3,717 of them no archive leaderboard matched the paper's tables, so there was nothing further to check); 733 were read and have nothing to place (arXiv has no HTML version of the paper, or that version has no tables), 41 could not be read (the extractor's reply could not be parsed), and results from the other 2 appear after they are checked.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections