Papers › Zero-Shot Video Question Answering with Procedural Programs

Zero-Shot Video Question Answering with Procedural Programs

1 Dec 2023arXiv:2312.00937archive 2025-07-28

Rohan Choudhury, Koichiro Niinuma, Kris M. Kitani, László A. Jeni

We propose to answer zero-shot questions about videos by generating short procedural programs that derive a final answer from solving a sequence of visual subtasks. We present Procedural Video Querying (ProViQ), which uses a large language model to generate such programs from an input question and an API of visual modules in the prompt, then executes them to obtain the output. Recent similar procedural approaches have proven successful for image question answering, but videos remain challenging: we provide ProViQ with modules intended for video understanding, allowing it to generalize to a wide variety of videos. This code generation framework additionally enables ProViQ to perform other video tasks in addition to question answering, such as multi-object tracking or basic video editing. ProViQ achieves state-of-the-art results on a diverse range of benchmarks, with improvements of up to 25% on short, long, open-ended, and multimodal video question-answering datasets. Our project page is at https://rccchoudhury.github.io/proviq2023.

PaperPDF

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Code GenerationLanguage ModelingLanguage ModellingLarge Language ModelMulti-Object TrackingObject TrackingQuestion AnsweringVideo EditingVideo Question AnsweringVideo UnderstandingVisual Question Answering (VQA)Zero-Shot Video Question Answer

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Zero-Shot Video Question Answer NExT-QA ProViQ Accuracy 64.6 #17 of 27 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections