Papers › Toward Understanding Supervised Representation Learning with RKHS and GAN

Toward Understanding Supervised Representation Learning with RKHS and GAN

1 Jan 2021archive 2025-07-28

Xu Liao, Jin Liu, Tianwen Wen, Yuling Jiao, Jian Huang

The success of deep supervised learning depends on its automatic data representation abilities. A good representation of high-dimensional complex data should enjoy low-dimensionally and disentanglement while losing as little information as possible. In this work, we give a statistical understanding of how deep representation goals can be achieved with reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces (RKHS) and generative adversarial networks (GAN). At the population level, we formulate the ideal representation learning task as that of finding a nonlinear map that minimizes the sum of losses characterizing conditional independence (with RKHS) and disentanglement (with GAN). We estimate the target map at the sample level nonparametrically with deep neural networks. We prove the consistency in terms of the population objective function value. We validate the proposed methods via comprehensive numerical experiments and real data analysis in the context of regression and classification. The resulting prediction accuracies are better than state-of-the-art methods.

PaperPDF

Code

No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

DisentanglementImage ClassificationRepresentation Learning

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Image Classification Kuzushiji-MNIST CN(d=32) Accuracy 98.84 #6 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification Kuzushiji-MNIST NSRL (log D) (d=16) Accuracy 98.81 #7 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification Kuzushiji-MNIST CN(d=16) Accuracy 98.80 #8 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification Kuzushiji-MNIST NSRL (WGAN) (d=32) Accuracy 98.72 #12 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification Kuzushiji-MNIST NSRL (WGAN) (d=8) Accuracy 98.68 #13 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification Kuzushiji-MNIST NSRL (WGAN) (d=16) Accuracy 98.66 #14 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification Kuzushiji-MNIST NSRL (log D) (d=32) Accuracy 98.63 #15 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification Kuzushiji-MNIST NSRL (log D) (d=8) Accuracy 98.61 #16 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification Kuzushiji-MNIST CN(d=8) Accuracy 98.60 #17 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification STL-10 CN(d=128) Percentage correct 98.45 #4 of 117 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification STL-10 CN(d=64) Percentage correct 98.36 #5 of 117 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification STL-10 NSRL+CN(d=128) Percentage correct 98.36 #6 of 117 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification STL-10 NSRL+CN(d=32) Percentage correct 98.34 #7 of 117 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification STL-10 NSRL+CN(d=64) Percentage correct 98.24 #8 of 117 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification STL-10 CN(d=32) Percentage correct 98.17 #9 of 117 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections