Papers › Structure fusion based on graph convolutional networks for semi-supervised classification
Structure fusion based on graph convolutional networks for semi-supervised classification
Guangfeng Lin, Jing Wang, Kaiyang Liao, Fan Zhao, Wanjun Chen
Suffering from the multi-view data diversity and complexity for semi-supervised classification, most of existing graph convolutional networks focus on the networks architecture construction or the salient graph structure preservation, and ignore the the complete graph structure for semi-supervised classification contribution. To mine the more complete distribution structure from multi-view data with the consideration of the specificity and the commonality, we propose structure fusion based on graph convolutional networks (SF-GCN) for improving the performance of semi-supervised classification. SF-GCN can not only retain the special characteristic of each view data by spectral embedding, but also capture the common style of multi-view data by distance metric between multi-graph structures. Suppose the linear relationship between multi-graph structures, we can construct the optimization function of structure fusion model by balancing the specificity loss and the commonality loss. By solving this function, we can simultaneously obtain the fusion spectral embedding from the multi-view data and the fusion structure as adjacent matrix to input graph convolutional networks for semi-supervised classification. Experiments demonstrate that the performance of SF-GCN outperforms that of the state of the arts on three challenging datasets, which are Cora,Citeseer and Pubmed in citation networks.
Code
No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Node Classification | Citeseer | SPF-GCN | Accuracy | 73.5% | #31 of 71 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Node Classification | Citeseer | SF-GCN | Accuracy | 73.4% | #33 of 71 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Node Classification | Cora | SPF-GCN | Accuracy | 83.5% | #38 of 73 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Node Classification | Cora | SF-GCN | Accuracy | 83.3% | #41 of 73 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Node Classification | Pubmed | SPF-GCN | Accuracy | 80.0% | #35 of 70 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Node Classification | Pubmed | SF-GCN | Accuracy | 79.3% | #49 of 70 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections