Papers › SPIdepth: Strengthened Pose Information for Self-supervised Monocular Depth Estimation

SPIdepth: Strengthened Pose Information for Self-supervised Monocular Depth Estimation

18 Apr 2024arXiv:2404.12501archive 2025-07-28

Mykola Lavreniuk

Self-supervised monocular depth estimation has garnered considerable attention for its applications in autonomous driving and robotics. While recent methods have made strides in leveraging techniques like the Self Query Layer (SQL) to infer depth from motion, they often overlook the potential of strengthening pose information. In this paper, we introduce SPIdepth, a novel approach that prioritizes enhancing the pose network for improved depth estimation. Building upon the foundation laid by SQL, SPIdepth emphasizes the importance of pose information in capturing fine-grained scene structures. By enhancing the pose network's capabilities, SPIdepth achieves remarkable advancements in scene understanding and depth estimation. Experimental results on benchmark datasets such as KITTI, Cityscapes, and Make3D showcase SPIdepth's state-of-the-art performance, surpassing previous methods by significant margins. Specifically, SPIdepth tops the self-supervised KITTI benchmark. Additionally, SPIdepth achieves the lowest AbsRel (0.029), SqRel (0.069), and RMSE (1.394) on KITTI, establishing new state-of-the-art results. On Cityscapes, SPIdepth shows improvements over SQLdepth of 21.7% in AbsRel, 36.8% in SqRel, and 16.5% in RMSE, even without using motion masks. On Make3D, SPIdepth in zero-shot outperforms all other models. Remarkably, SPIdepth achieves these results using only a single image for inference, surpassing even methods that utilize video sequences for inference, thus demonstrating its efficacy and efficiency in real-world applications. Our approach represents a significant leap forward in self-supervised monocular depth estimation, underscoring the importance of strengthening pose information for advancing scene understanding in real-world applications. The code and pre-trained models are publicly available at https://github.com/Lavreniuk/SPIdepth.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2404.12501")

Code

Syntology Ran 13 of 14 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 1 has no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract; 1 ran · violated contract; 1 ran · our draft was wrong; 1 ran · fixture could not drive it; 9 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: official repository: 14 samples from 1 repository, 13 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

Lavreniuk/SPIdepth officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

14 samples harvested; 13 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · honoured contract
1ran · violated contract
1ran · our draft was wrong
1ran · fixture could not drive it
9ran
1unverified

Licence: 0 of the 14 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from Lavreniuk/SPIdepth. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

gray2rgb Lavreniuk/SPIdepth/CKA_visualize.py official repository ran · violated contract MIT (permissive) · 94402f271c35bec0 · report
batch_post_process_disparity Lavreniuk/SPIdepth/evaluate_depth_config.py official repository ran · fixture could not drive it fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · a8814cc5c348b987 · report
cls_padding Lavreniuk/SPIdepth/CKA_visualize.py official repository ran MIT (permissive) · d2ebd83bfabb3603 · report
compute_errors Lavreniuk/SPIdepth/evaluate_depth_config.py official repository ran · honoured contract fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · edd4f86e8f02732f · report
compute_errors Lavreniuk/SPIdepth/finetune/evaluate_metric_depth.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · acb6c7be50a85a77 · report
convert_R3x3t1x3_to_Transform4x4 Lavreniuk/SPIdepth/layers.py official repository ran MIT (permissive) · fcd63b56aa65b0a4 · report
denormalize Lavreniuk/SPIdepth/finetune/evaluate_metric_depth.py official repository ran MIT (permissive) · 89177c685e07c0df · report
disp_to_depth Lavreniuk/SPIdepth/calc_layers.py official repository ran MIT (permissive) · 62287188376f0ba0 · report
get_translation_matrix Lavreniuk/SPIdepth/calc_layers.py official repository ran fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · 955112f5788539a8 · report
highlight_grid Lavreniuk/SPIdepth/CKA_visualize.py official repository ran MIT (permissive) · b8681e1b096dae74 · report
preprocessing_transforms Lavreniuk/SPIdepth/finetune/dataloader.py official repository ran MIT (permissive) · 92654d948ee55789 · report
remove_leading_slash Lavreniuk/SPIdepth/finetune/dataloader.py official repository ran fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · faac9130cc118fec · report
transformation_from_parameters Lavreniuk/SPIdepth/calc_layers.py official repository ran MIT (permissive) · cdc03d6bfc4d3a34 · report
predict_tta Lavreniuk/SPIdepth/finetune/evaluate_metric_depth.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 1781f75a68fc284c · report

Tasks

Autonomous DrivingDepth EstimationMonocular Depth EstimationScene UnderstandingUnsupervised Monocular Depth Estimation

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Monocular Depth Estimation KITTI Eigen split SPIDepth Delta < 1.25 0.99 #1 of 79 Archive leaderboard report
Monocular Depth Estimation KITTI Eigen split SPIDepth Delta < 1.25^2 0.999 #1 of 79 Archive leaderboard report
Monocular Depth Estimation KITTI Eigen split SPIDepth Delta < 1.25^3 1.000 #1 of 79 Archive leaderboard report
Monocular Depth Estimation KITTI Eigen split SPIDepth RMSE 1.394 #1 of 79 Archive leaderboard report
Monocular Depth Estimation KITTI Eigen split SPIDepth RMSE log 0.048 #1 of 79 Archive leaderboard report
Monocular Depth Estimation KITTI Eigen split SPIDepth Sq Rel 0.069 #1 of 79 Archive leaderboard report
Monocular Depth Estimation KITTI Eigen split SPIDepth absolute relative error 0.029 #1 of 79 Archive leaderboard report
Monocular Depth Estimation KITTI Eigen split unsupervised SPIdepth Delta < 1.25 0.94 #1 of 55 Archive leaderboard report
Monocular Depth Estimation KITTI Eigen split unsupervised SPIdepth Delta < 1.25^2 0.973 #1 of 55 Archive leaderboard report
Monocular Depth Estimation KITTI Eigen split unsupervised SPIdepth Delta < 1.25^3 0.985 #1 of 55 Archive leaderboard report
Monocular Depth Estimation KITTI Eigen split unsupervised SPIdepth Mono X #1 of 55 Archive leaderboard report
Monocular Depth Estimation KITTI Eigen split unsupervised SPIdepth RMSE 3.662 #1 of 55 Archive leaderboard report
Monocular Depth Estimation KITTI Eigen split unsupervised SPIdepth RMSE log 0.153 #1 of 55 Archive leaderboard report
Monocular Depth Estimation KITTI Eigen split unsupervised SPIdepth Resolution 1024x320 #1 of 55 Archive leaderboard report
Monocular Depth Estimation KITTI Eigen split unsupervised SPIdepth Sq Rel 0.531 #1 of 55 Archive leaderboard report
Monocular Depth Estimation KITTI Eigen split unsupervised SPIdepth Test frames 1 #1 of 55 Archive leaderboard report
Monocular Depth Estimation KITTI Eigen split unsupervised SPIdepth absolute relative error 0.071 #1 of 55 Archive leaderboard report
Monocular Depth Estimation Make3D SPIDepth Abs Rel 0.299 #1 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Monocular Depth Estimation Make3D SPIDepth RMSE 6.672 #1 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Monocular Depth Estimation Make3D SPIDepth Sq Rel 1.931 #1 of 6 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

AttentionLinear LayerMulti-Head AttentionTransformer

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections