Papers › Self-supervised Learning of LiDAR 3D Point Clouds via 2D-3D Neural Calibration
Self-supervised Learning of LiDAR 3D Point Clouds via 2D-3D Neural Calibration
Yifan Zhang, Siyu Ren, Junhui Hou, Jinjian Wu, Yixuan Yuan, Guangming Shi
This paper introduces a novel self-supervised learning framework for enhancing 3D perception in autonomous driving scenes. Specifically, our approach, namely NCLR, focuses on 2D-3D neural calibration, a novel pretext task that estimates the rigid pose aligning camera and LiDAR coordinate systems. First, we propose the learnable transformation alignment to bridge the domain gap between image and point cloud data, converting features into a unified representation space for effective comparison and matching. Second, we identify the overlapping area between the image and point cloud with the fused features. Third, we establish dense 2D-3D correspondences to estimate the rigid pose. The framework not only learns fine-grained matching from points to pixels but also achieves alignment of the image and point cloud at a holistic level, understanding their relative pose. We demonstrate the efficacy of NCLR by applying the pre-trained backbone to downstream tasks, such as LiDAR-based 3D semantic segmentation, object detection, and panoptic segmentation. Comprehensive experiments on various datasets illustrate the superiority of NCLR over existing self-supervised methods. The results confirm that joint learning from different modalities significantly enhances the network's understanding abilities and effectiveness of learned representation. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/Eaphan/NCLR.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2401.12452")
Code
Syntology Ran 24 of 26 code samples harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper; 2 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · violated contract; 3 ran · our draft was wrong; 3 ran · fixture could not drive it; 17 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: official repository: 11 samples from 1 repository, 10 ran; community (archive-listed): 12 samples from 1 repository, 11 ran; 3 identical to code first harvested elsewhere. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
26 samples harvested; 24 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 26 of the 26 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. Some samples are identical code Syntology first harvested from another repository; for those, this paper's copy is not located and its licence is not recorded. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
d30c03f27e494c3c · report
fd2ccb302a5c2310 · report
3d7f0e7dd8fdeb74 · report
408a3d02069cff3a · report
497ee1ee5d05dcd0 · report
70596f28650426a1 · report
d08e64b2d73c665b · report
def5efb3f261d1c1 · report
ce2dbefef7a9a194 · report
d8fbeeb1bc0bfeee · report
6f7320d8f113ebd6 · report
fc333893f7271b90 · report
60f2f4207ae20ab9 · report
80730c3bb0cf7118 · report
857b8f722d0dcda1 · report
d9def42110729a85 · report
160bb14bd76201b4 · report
4af84e33621075ff · report
77bbbfa9a1d1b7f5 · report
685179cc383d2145 · report
573cb024ea47999f · report
580dee6761649b29 · report
457b688bce1b0ffe · report
6fef16c520722b39 · report
5f4f4355be28c01e · report
ed2a67a7b19a5c07 · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections