Papers › Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistry

Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistry

4 Apr 2017ICML 2017 8arXiv:1704.01212archive 2025-07-28

Justin Gilmer, Samuel S. Schoenholz, Patrick F. Riley, Oriol Vinyals, George E. Dahl

Supervised learning on molecules has incredible potential to be useful in chemistry, drug discovery, and materials science. Luckily, several promising and closely related neural network models invariant to molecular symmetries have already been described in the literature. These models learn a message passing algorithm and aggregation procedure to compute a function of their entire input graph. At this point, the next step is to find a particularly effective variant of this general approach and apply it to chemical prediction benchmarks until we either solve them or reach the limits of the approach. In this paper, we reformulate existing models into a single common framework we call Message Passing Neural Networks (MPNNs) and explore additional novel variations within this framework. Using MPNNs we demonstrate state of the art results on an important molecular property prediction benchmark; these results are strong enough that we believe future work should focus on datasets with larger molecules or more accurate ground truth labels.

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="1704.01212")

Code

Syntology Ran 3 of 3 code samples harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 3 ran · our draft was wrong.

By repository: community (archive-listed): 2 samples from 2 repositories, 2 ran; 1 identical to code first harvested elsewhere. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

20 repositories listed; official and paper-mentioned ones first.

brain-research/mpnn officialmentioned on GitHubtf report
CoderPat/OpenGNN mentioned on GitHubtfMIT report
LRacoci/permutation-graphml mentioned on GitHubtf report
Samyu0304/thought-propagation mentioned on GitHubNOASSERTION report
Tony-Y/cgnn mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
cts198859/deeprl_dist mentioned on GitHubtf report
cts198859/deeprl_network mentioned on GitHubtf report
dongchen06/macacc mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
fredjo89/heterogeneous-mpnn mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
nrel/m2p mentioned on GitHubBSD-3-Clause report
priba/nmp_qc mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
priba/siamese_ged mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
teddykoker/mpnn-for-quantum-chem mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
tomdbar/eco-dqn mentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report
Saro00/DGN pytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

3 samples harvested; 3 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

3ran · our draft was wrong

Licence: 1 of the 3 samples is pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. Some samples are identical code Syntology first harvested from another repository; for those, this paper's copy is not located and its licence is not recorded. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

create_dim_in fredjo89/heterogeneous-mpnn/models_HMPNN_ct.py community (archive-listed) ran · our draft was wrong MIT (permissive) · dd41a32952411206 · report
feed_forward teddykoker/mpnn-for-quantum-chem/mpnn/model.py community (archive-listed) ran · our draft was wrong MIT (permissive) · 663130aa4f6e9397 · report
restricted_float identical code first harvested elsewhere ran · our draft was wrong licence of this copy not recorded · 06ae24901264ad1a · report

Tasks

Drug DiscoveryFormation EnergyGraph RegressionMolecular Property PredictionNode ClassificationProperty Prediction

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Drug Discovery QM9 MPNNs Error ratio 0.68 #9 of 11 Archive leaderboard report
Formation Energy QM9 MPNN MAE 0.49 #17 of 18 Archive leaderboard report
Graph Regression Lipophilicity MPNN RMSE 0.719 #13 of 23 Archive leaderboard report
Graph Regression ZINC 100k MPNN MAE 0.288 #5 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Graph Regression ZINC-500k MPNN (sum) MAE 0.145 #26 of 36 Archive leaderboard report
Graph Regression ZINC-500k MPNN (max) MAE 0.252 #29 of 36 Archive leaderboard report
Node Classification CiteSeer with Public Split: fixed 20 nodes per class MPNN Accuracy 64.0 #39 of 40 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

Introduced by this paper: MPNN

GRUMPNN

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections