Papers › Multi-interactive Feature Learning and a Full-time Multi-modality Benchmark for Image...

Multi-interactive Feature Learning and a Full-time Multi-modality Benchmark for Image Fusion and Segmentation

4 Aug 2023ICCV 2023 1arXiv:2308.02097archive 2025-07-28

JinYuan Liu, Zhu Liu, Guanyao Wu, Long Ma, Risheng Liu, Wei Zhong, Zhongxuan Luo, Xin Fan

Multi-modality image fusion and segmentation play a vital role in autonomous driving and robotic operation. Early efforts focus on boosting the performance for only one task, \emph{e.g.,} fusion or segmentation, making it hard to reach~`Best of Both Worlds'. To overcome this issue, in this paper, we propose a \textbf{M}ulti-\textbf{i}nteractive \textbf{F}eature learning architecture for image fusion and \textbf{Seg}mentation, namely SegMiF, and exploit dual-task correlation to promote the performance of both tasks. The SegMiF is of a cascade structure, containing a fusion sub-network and a commonly used segmentation sub-network. By slickly bridging intermediate features between two components, the knowledge learned from the segmentation task can effectively assist the fusion task. Also, the benefited fusion network supports the segmentation one to perform more pretentiously. Besides, a hierarchical interactive attention block is established to ensure fine-grained mapping of all the vital information between two tasks, so that the modality/semantic features can be fully mutual-interactive. In addition, a dynamic weight factor is introduced to automatically adjust the corresponding weights of each task, which can balance the interactive feature correspondence and break through the limitation of laborious tuning. Furthermore, we construct a smart multi-wave binocular imaging system and collect a full-time multi-modality benchmark with 15 annotated pixel-level categories for image fusion and segmentation. Extensive experiments on several public datasets and our benchmark demonstrate that the proposed method outputs visually appealing fused images and perform averagely 7.66% higher segmentation mIoU in the real-world scene than the state-of-the-art approaches. The source code and benchmark are available at \url{https://github.com/JinyuanLiu-CV/SegMiF}.

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2308.02097")

Code

Syntology Ran 19 of 26 code samples harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper; 7 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract; 18 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: official repository: 13 samples from 1 repository, 12 ran; community (archive-listed): 13 samples from 1 repository, 7 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

jinyuanliu-cv/segmif officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report
runjia0124/coconet mentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

26 samples harvested; 19 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 7 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · honoured contract
18ran
7unverified

Licence: 13 of the 26 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

YCrCb2RGB jinyuanliu-cv/segmif/core/model_fusion.py official repository ran fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · 145edd13c3925a58 · report
compute_cls_loss jinyuanliu-cv/segmif/core/loss.py official repository ran no licence file found · pointer only · c567234c5e7fa848 · report
compute_cnt_loss jinyuanliu-cv/segmif/core/loss.py official repository ran no licence file found · pointer only · 2fe6b97c7e7cccbb · report
coords_fmap2orig jinyuanliu-cv/segmif/core/loss.py official repository ran fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · 68ee569246bd7e3a · report
downsample jinyuanliu-cv/segmif/lap_loss.py official repository ran fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · 1f6001e1c3b06556 · report
gauss_kernel jinyuanliu-cv/segmif/lap_loss.py official repository ran no licence file found · pointer only · 4a150d48b91667f9 · report
load_img_name_list jinyuanliu-cv/segmif/datasets/voc_method.py official repository ran no licence file found · pointer only · 0cc9285c14985e5d · report
normalize_img jinyuanliu-cv/segmif/datasets/imutils.py official repository ran no licence file found · pointer only · d1a6979f946f9e74 · report
prepare_data_path jinyuanliu-cv/segmif/TaskFusion_dataset2.py official repository ran no licence file found · pointer only · b79bae2be65a7ef0 · report
random_scaling jinyuanliu-cv/segmif/datasets/imutils.py official repository ran no licence file found · pointer only · a920d698dd17a625 · report
random_scaling2 jinyuanliu-cv/segmif/datasets/imutils.py official repository ran no licence file found · pointer only · 49fc95c7acdb2ea4 · report
upsample jinyuanliu-cv/segmif/lap_loss.py official repository ran fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · 267b7d002ecac955 · report
RGB2YCrCb jinyuanliu-cv/segmif/core/model_fusion.py official repository unverified no licence file found · pointer only · 6b1c47ea9127b33e · report
YCbCr2RGB runjia0124/coconet/utils/utils.py community (archive-listed) ran fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · 92167228343b84a5 · report
fname_presuffix runjia0124/coconet/utils/utils.py community (archive-listed) ran MIT (permissive) · 71a890b56b7f51ea · report
normPRED runjia0124/coconet/utils/save_image.py community (archive-listed) ran · honoured contract fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · 89e4412c100b0f9b · report
normimage runjia0124/coconet/utils/save_image.py community (archive-listed) ran MIT (permissive) · df54d7f9e9e4ab99 · report
normimage_test runjia0124/coconet/utils/save_image.py community (archive-listed) ran MIT (permissive) · 1d18356aa2fee4e0 · report
split_filename runjia0124/coconet/utils/utils.py community (archive-listed) ran fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · 47482689d9a75517 · report
weights_to_cpu runjia0124/coconet/utils/checkpoint.py community (archive-listed) ran MIT (permissive) · b683a315ccc25715 · report
load_model runjia0124/coconet/models/P_loss.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · bbfe8d248ce2ed69 · report
load_part runjia0124/coconet/utils/checkpoint.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 0511b91fcab989b2 · report
measure_info runjia0124/coconet/models/train_tasks.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 76e6bd620ca82ccc · report
measure_module1 runjia0124/coconet/models/train_tasks.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 4f4b727b0fc6cd95 · report
resume runjia0124/coconet/utils/checkpoint.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · a3db2d0cc62c57ce · report
softmax runjia0124/coconet/models/train_tasks.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 7fbf8b3d61a9af4b · report

Tasks

Autonomous DrivingSegmentationSemantic SegmentationThermal Image Segmentation

Datasets

Introduced by this paper, per the archive.

FMB Dataset

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Semantic Segmentation FMB Dataset SegMiF (RGB-Infrared) mIoU 54.80 #7 of 14 Archive leaderboard report
Semantic Segmentation FMB Dataset SegMiF (RGB) mIoU 50.50 #10 of 14 Archive leaderboard report
Thermal Image Segmentation MFN Dataset SegMiF mIOU 56.1 #25 of 55 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

Focus

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections