Papers › MnasNet: Platform-Aware Neural Architecture Search for Mobile

MnasNet: Platform-Aware Neural Architecture Search for Mobile

31 Jul 2018CVPR 2019 6arXiv:1807.11626archive 2025-07-28

Mingxing Tan, Bo Chen, Ruoming Pang, Vijay Vasudevan, Mark Sandler, Andrew Howard, Quoc V. Le

Designing convolutional neural networks (CNN) for mobile devices is challenging because mobile models need to be small and fast, yet still accurate. Although significant efforts have been dedicated to design and improve mobile CNNs on all dimensions, it is very difficult to manually balance these trade-offs when there are so many architectural possibilities to consider. In this paper, we propose an automated mobile neural architecture search (MNAS) approach, which explicitly incorporate model latency into the main objective so that the search can identify a model that achieves a good trade-off between accuracy and latency. Unlike previous work, where latency is considered via another, often inaccurate proxy (e.g., FLOPS), our approach directly measures real-world inference latency by executing the model on mobile phones. To further strike the right balance between flexibility and search space size, we propose a novel factorized hierarchical search space that encourages layer diversity throughout the network. Experimental results show that our approach consistently outperforms state-of-the-art mobile CNN models across multiple vision tasks. On the ImageNet classification task, our MnasNet achieves 75.2% top-1 accuracy with 78ms latency on a Pixel phone, which is 1.8x faster than MobileNetV2 [29] with 0.5% higher accuracy and 2.3x faster than NASNet [36] with 1.2% higher accuracy. Our MnasNet also achieves better mAP quality than MobileNets for COCO object detection. Code is at https://github.com/tensorflow/tpu/tree/master/models/official/mnasnet

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="1807.11626")

Code

Syntology Ran 2 of 6 code samples harvested from 3 repositories linked to this paper; 4 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract; 1 ran · our draft was wrong.

By repository: community (archive-listed): 6 samples from 3 repositories, 2 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

29 repositories listed; official and paper-mentioned ones first.

tensorflow/tpu officialmentioned in papertfApache-2.0 report
PotatoSpudowski/CactiNet mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
abhoi/Keras-MnasNet mentioned on GitHubMIT report
cgebbe/kaggle_pku-autonomous-driving mentioned on GitHubpytorchGPL-3.0 report
meijieru/yet_another_mobilenet_series mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
mingxingtan/mnasnet mentioned on GitHubtf report
nsarang/MnasNet mentioned on GitHubtf report
osmr/imgclsmob mentioned on GitHubmxnetMIT report
rwightman/gen-efficientnet-pytorch mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
rwightman/pytorch-image-models mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
tensorflow/tpu mentioned on GitHubtf report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

6 samples harvested; 2 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 4 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · honoured contract
1ran · our draft was wrong
4unverified

Licence: 2 of the 6 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from 3 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

decode_block_string nsarang/MnasNet/MnasNet_models.py community (archive-listed) ran · our draft was wrong no licence file found · pointer only · 17683a828f07d255 · report
round_filters nsarang/MnasNet/MnasNet.py community (archive-listed) ran · honoured contract no licence file found · pointer only · 285e4d1d9a3faeba · report
MnasNet abhoi/Keras-MnasNet/model.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 6923008e5afde2dc · report
check_model_file renmada/MnasNet-paddle/paddleclas.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · a39394c9a8e29425 · report
rerange_index renmada/MnasNet-paddle/ppcls/loss/comfunc.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 21421188135068e9 · report
similar_architectures renmada/MnasNet-paddle/paddleclas.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · f262aa35d9f2b50f · report

Tasks

Image ClassificationNeural Architecture SearchObject DetectionReal-Time Object Detectionobject-detection

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Image Classification ImageNet MnasNet-A3 GFLOPs 0.806 #903 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet MnasNet-A3 Number of params 5.2M #903 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet MnasNet-A3 Operations per network pass 0.0403G #903 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet MnasNet-A3 Top 1 Accuracy 76.7% #903 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet MnasNet-A2 GFLOPs 0.680 #944 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet MnasNet-A2 Number of params 4.8M #944 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet MnasNet-A2 Top 1 Accuracy 75.6% #944 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet MnasNet-A1 GFLOPs 0.624 #955 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet MnasNet-A1 Number of params 3.9M #955 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet MnasNet-A1 Top 1 Accuracy 75.2% #955 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

1x1 ConvolutionAverage PoolingBatch NormalizationConvolutionDense ConnectionsDepthwise ConvolutionDepthwise Separable ConvolutionDropoutGlobal Average PoolingInverted Residual BlockLSTMLinear Warmup With Linear DecayMnasNetPointwise ConvolutionRMSPropRandom Horizontal FlipRandom Resized CropReLUSigmoid ActivationSoftmaxSqueeze-and-Excitation BlockTanh ActivationWeight Decay

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections