Papers › Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentation

Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentation

14 Nov 2014CVPR 2015 6arXiv:1411.4038archive 2025-07-28

Jonathan Long, Evan Shelhamer, Trevor Darrell

Convolutional networks are powerful visual models that yield hierarchies of features. We show that convolutional networks by themselves, trained end-to-end, pixels-to-pixels, exceed the state-of-the-art in semantic segmentation. Our key insight is to build "fully convolutional" networks that take input of arbitrary size and produce correspondingly-sized output with efficient inference and learning. We define and detail the space of fully convolutional networks, explain their application to spatially dense prediction tasks, and draw connections to prior models. We adapt contemporary classification networks (AlexNet, the VGG net, and GoogLeNet) into fully convolutional networks and transfer their learned representations by fine-tuning to the segmentation task. We then define a novel architecture that combines semantic information from a deep, coarse layer with appearance information from a shallow, fine layer to produce accurate and detailed segmentations. Our fully convolutional network achieves state-of-the-art segmentation of PASCAL VOC (20% relative improvement to 62.2% mean IU on 2012), NYUDv2, and SIFT Flow, while inference takes one third of a second for a typical image.

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="1411.4038")

Code

Syntology Ran 3 of 4 code samples harvested from 3 repositories linked to this paper; 1 has no recorded run. Of those that ran: 2 ran · our draft was wrong; 1 ran · fixture could not drive it.

By repository: community (archive-listed): 4 samples from 3 repositories, 3 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

51 repositories listed; official and paper-mentioned ones first.

DLWK/EANet mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
GodPater/model_fcn mentioned on GitHubtf report
LeeMax117/FCN_8s mentioned on GitHubtf report
LeeMax117/week10_homework mentioned on GitHubtf report
RogerQi/pascal-5i mentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report
SDMrFeng/quiz-w10-fcn mentioned on GitHubtf report
SethEBaldwin/FCN mentioned on GitHubtf report
TianchengQ/FCN mentioned on GitHubtf report
YigeunLee/fcn32 mentioned on GitHubtf report
alvinwen428/featurecp mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
andyzeng/apc-vision-toolbox mentioned on GitHubBSD-2-Clause report
anoushkrit/Knowledge mentioned on GitHubpytorchApache-2.0 report
azraelzhor/tf-FCN mentioned on GitHubtf report
colorfulxd/WK10_FCN mentioned on GitHubtf report
frank-roesler/Image_Segmentation mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
giovanniguidi/FCN-keras mentioned on GitHub report
githubfa/FCN mentioned on GitHubtf report
hahahappyboy/GANForCartoon mentioned on GitHubpytorchGPL-2.0 report
hitukensinn/quiz-w9-code mentioned on GitHubtf report
hz-ants/apc-vision-toolbox mentioned on GitHubBSD-2-Clause report
jqueguiner/camembert-as-a-service mentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report
jqueguiner/image-segmentation mentioned on GitHubGPL-3.0 report
kbardool/mrcnn3 mentioned on GitHubtfNOASSERTION report
koryako/AI-application mentioned on GitHubtf report
lanthlove/segmentation-fcn mentioned on GitHubtf report
minoring/fcn mentioned on GitHubtf report
muramasa8191/DeepLearning mentioned on GitHubtf report
pessimiss/ai100-w9-master mentioned on GitHubtf report
pochih/fcn-pytorch mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
robromijnders/segm mentioned on GitHubtf report
shenshutao/image_segmentation mentioned on GitHubtf report
sigtot/unet-auto mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
sunnynevarekar/FCN mentioned on GitHubtf report
tsixta/jnet mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
zhuyi55/week10 mentioned on GitHubtf report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

4 samples harvested; 3 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

2ran · our draft was wrong
1ran · fixture could not drive it
1unverified

Licence: 4 of the 4 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from 3 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

image2label githubfa/FCN/convert_fcn_dataset.py community (archive-listed) ran · fixture could not drive it fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · f3ca1f3716d95661 · report
make_layers pochih/fcn-pytorch/python/fcn.py community (archive-listed) ran · our draft was wrong no licence file found · pointer only · 35e373ea432491af · report
read_images_names githubfa/FCN/convert_fcn_dataset.py community (archive-listed) ran · our draft was wrong no licence file found · pointer only · 016fff2e8cba6727 · report
get_result YigeunLee/fcn32/fully_cnn.py community (archive-listed) unverified no licence file found · pointer only · 73d1eec357fb97af · report

Tasks

Crack SegmentationMulti-tissue Nucleus SegmentationMultispectral Object DetectionSegmentationSemantic SegmentationThermal Image Segmentation

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Crack Segmentation CrackVision12K FCN mIoU 0.59842 #3 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Multi-tissue Nucleus Segmentation Kumar FCN8 (e) Dice 0.797 #14 of 18 Archive leaderboard report
Multi-tissue Nucleus Segmentation Kumar FCN8 (e) Hausdorff Distance (mm) 31.2 #14 of 18 Archive leaderboard report
Multispectral Object Detection KAIST Multispectral Pedestrian Detection Benchmark FusionRPN+BF All Miss Rate 51.70 #15 of 17 Archive leaderboard report
Semantic Segmentation ADE20K FCN Validation mIoU 29.39 #229 of 235 Archive leaderboard report
Semantic Segmentation COCO-Stuff test FCN (VGG-16) mIoU 22.7% #21 of 21 Archive leaderboard report
Semantic Segmentation Event-based Segmentation Dataset FCN mIoU 59.6 #6 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Semantic Segmentation Fine-Grained Grass Segmentation Dataset FCN mIoU 47.47 #9 of 10 Archive leaderboard report
Semantic Segmentation PASCAL Context FCN-8s mIoU 37.8 #63 of 66 Archive leaderboard report
Semantic Segmentation PASCAL VOC 2012 test FCN (VGG-16) Mean IoU 62.2% #49 of 51 Archive leaderboard report
Semantic Segmentation SELMA FCN mIoU 68.2 #6 of 7 Archive leaderboard report
Semantic Segmentation SkyScapes-Dense FCN8s (ResNet-50) Mean IoU 33.06 #3 of 7 Archive leaderboard report
Semantic Segmentation SkyScapes-Lane FCN8s (ResNet-50) Mean IoU 13.74 #2 of 2 Archive leaderboard report
Semantic Segmentation Trans10K FCN GFLOPs 42.23 #11 of 15 Archive leaderboard report
Semantic Segmentation Trans10K FCN mIoU 62.75% #11 of 15 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

Average PoolingConvolutionDense ConnectionsDropoutGlobal Average PoolingMax PoolingReLUSoftmax

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections