Papers › Few-Shot Learning by Integrating Spatial and Frequency Representation

Few-Shot Learning by Integrating Spatial and Frequency Representation

11 May 2021arXiv:2105.05348archive 2025-07-28

Xiangyu Chen, Guanghui Wang

Human beings can recognize new objects with only a few labeled examples, however, few-shot learning remains a challenging problem for machine learning systems. Most previous algorithms in few-shot learning only utilize spatial information of the images. In this paper, we propose to integrate the frequency information into the learning model to boost the discrimination ability of the system. We employ Discrete Cosine Transformation (DCT) to generate the frequency representation, then, integrate the features from both the spatial domain and frequency domain for classification. The proposed strategy and its effectiveness are validated with different backbones, datasets, and algorithms. Extensive experiments demonstrate that the frequency information is complementary to the spatial representations in few-shot classification. The classification accuracy is boosted significantly by integrating features from both the spatial and frequency domains in different few-shot learning tasks.

PaperPDFConference PDFCode

Code

xiangyu8/PT-MAP-sf officialmentioned in paperpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

ClassificationFew-Shot Image ClassificationFew-Shot Learning

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Few-Shot Image Classification CUB 200 5-way 1-shot PT+MAP+SF (transductive) Accuracy 95.48 #4 of 36 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot Image Classification Mini-Imagenet 5-way (1-shot) PT+MAP (s+f) (transductive) Accuracy 84.81 #8 of 105 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections