Papers › Extended Batch Normalization
Extended Batch Normalization
Chunjie Luo, Jianfeng Zhan, Lei Wang, Wanling Gao
Batch normalization (BN) has become a standard technique for training the modern deep networks. However, its effectiveness diminishes when the batch size becomes smaller, since the batch statistics estimation becomes inaccurate. That hinders batch normalization's usage for 1) training larger model which requires small batches constrained by memory consumption, 2) training on mobile or embedded devices of which the memory resource is limited. In this paper, we propose a simple but effective method, called extended batch normalization (EBN). For NCHW format feature maps, extended batch normalization computes the mean along the (N, H, W) dimensions, as the same as batch normalization, to maintain the advantage of batch normalization. To alleviate the problem caused by small batch size, extended batch normalization computes the standard deviation along the (N, C, H, W) dimensions, thus enlarges the number of samples from which the standard deviation is computed. We compare extended batch normalization with batch normalization and group normalization on the datasets of MNIST, CIFAR-10/100, STL-10, and ImageNet, respectively. The experiments show that extended batch normalization alleviates the problem of batch normalization with small batch size while achieving close performances to batch normalization with large batch size.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image Classification | STL-10 | ResNet18(BN, 4) | Percentage correct | 81.04 | #61 of 117 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | STL-10 | ResNet18(GN, 4) | Percentage correct | 79.3 | #63 of 117 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | STL-10 | ResNet18(BN, 128) | Percentage correct | 78.65 | #65 of 117 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | STL-10 | ResNet18(EBN, 4) | Percentage correct | 76.49 | #73 of 117 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | STL-10 | ResNet18(EBN, 128) | Percentage correct | 75.57 | #75 of 117 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | STL-10 | ResNet18(GN, 128) | Percentage correct | 72.66 | #84 of 117 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections