Papers › Efficient Reinforcement Learning for StarCraft by Abstract Forward Models and Transfer Learning

Efficient Reinforcement Learning for StarCraft by Abstract Forward Models and Transfer Learning

2 Mar 2019arXiv:1903.00715archive 2025-07-28

Ruo-Ze Liu, Haifeng Guo, Xiaozhong Ji, Yang Yu, Zhen-Jia Pang, Zitai Xiao, Yuzhou Wu, Tong Lu

Injecting human knowledge is an effective way to accelerate reinforcement learning (RL). However, these methods are underexplored. This paper presents our discovery that an abstract forward model (thought-game (TG)) combined with transfer learning (TL) is an effective way. We take StarCraft II as our study environment. With the help of a designed TG, the agent can learn a 99% win-rate on a 64x64 map against the Level-7 built-in AI, using only 1.08 hours in a single commercial machine. We also show that the TG method is not as restrictive as it was thought to be. It can work with roughly designed TGs, and can also be useful when the environment changes. Comparing with previous model-based RL, we show TG is more effective. We also present a TG hypothesis that gives the influence of different fidelity levels of TG. For real games that have unequal state and action spaces, we proposed a novel XfrNet of which usefulness is validated while achieving a 90% win-rate against the cheating Level-10 AI. We argue that the TG method might shed light on further studies of efficient RL with human knowledge.

PaperPDFCode

Code

liuruoze/thought-sc2-model-experiment officialmentioned in papertf report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Reinforcement LearningReinforcement Learning (RL)StarcraftStarcraft IITransfer Learningreinforcement-learning

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections