Papers › Don’t Wait, Just Weight: Improving Unsupervised Representations by Learning...

Don’t Wait, Just Weight: Improving Unsupervised Representations by Learning Goal-Driven Instance Weights

22 Jun 2020archive 2025-07-28

Linus Ericsson

In the absence of large labelled datasets, self-supervised learning techniques can boost performance by learning useful representations from unlabelled data, which is often more readily available. However, there is often a domain shift between the unlabelled collection and the downstream target problem data. We show that by learning Bayesian instance weights for the unlabelled data, we can improve the downstream classification accuracy by prioritising the most useful instances. Additionally, we show that the training time can be reduced by discarding unnecessary datapoints. Our method, BetaDataWeighter is evaluated using the popular self-supervised rotation prediction task on STL-10 and Visual Decathlon. We compare to related instance weighting schemes, both hand-designed heuristics and meta-learning, as well as conventional self-supervised learning. BetaDataWeighter achieves both the highest average accuracy and rank across datasets, and on STL-10 it prunes up to 78% of unlabelled images without significant loss in accuracy, corresponding to over 50% reduction in training time.

PaperPDF

Code

No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Image ClassificationMeta-LearningSelf-Supervised Learning

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Image Classification STL-10 BDW Percentage correct 71.12 #87 of 117 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification STL-10 NN-Weighter Percentage correct 69.15 #93 of 117 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification STL-10 RotNet Percentage correct 68.19 #96 of 117 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification STL-10 L2RW Percentage correct 63.13 #99 of 117 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections