Papers › Dense-Resolution Network for Point Cloud Classification and Segmentation

Dense-Resolution Network for Point Cloud Classification and Segmentation

14 May 2020arXiv:2005.06734archive 2025-07-28

Shi Qiu, Saeed Anwar, Nick Barnes

Point cloud analysis is attracting attention from Artificial Intelligence research since it can be widely used in applications such as robotics, Augmented Reality, self-driving. However, it is always challenging due to irregularities, unorderedness, and sparsity. In this article, we propose a novel network named Dense-Resolution Network (DRNet) for point cloud analysis. Our DRNet is designed to learn local point features from the point cloud in different resolutions. In order to learn local point groups more effectively, we present a novel grouping method for local neighborhood searching and an error-minimizing module for capturing local features. In addition to validating the network on widely used point cloud segmentation and classification benchmarks, we also test and visualize the performance of the components. Comparing with other state-of-the-art methods, our network shows superiority on ModelNet40, ShapeNet synthetic and ScanObjectNN real point cloud datasets.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2005.06734")

Code

Syntology Ran 1 of 6 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 5 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · fixture could not drive it.

By repository: official repository: 6 samples from 1 repository, 1 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

ShiQiu0419/DRNet officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

6 samples harvested; 1 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 5 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · fixture could not drive it
5unverified

Licence: 0 of the 6 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from ShiQiu0419/DRNet. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

knn ShiQiu0419/DRNet/models/drnet.py official repository ran · fixture could not drive it fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · cdd0141594039dcb · report
knn_metric ShiQiu0419/DRNet/models/drnet.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 0e4bd4a67e33e127 · report
pdist2 ShiQiu0419/DRNet/pointnet2/utils/linalg_utils.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 2afefacc6e996a95 · report
pdist2_slow ShiQiu0419/DRNet/pointnet2/utils/linalg_utils.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 534f6ef2ad0bbfc9 · report
pw_dist ShiQiu0419/DRNet/models/drnet.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · ef3cfa753da2af31 · report
set_bn_momentum_default ShiQiu0419/DRNet/train_partseg_gpus.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 0ad12b1e8408e2f9 · report

Tasks

3D Part Segmentation3D Point Cloud ClassificationClassificationGeneral ClassificationPoint Cloud ClassificationPoint Cloud Segmentation

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
3D Part Segmentation ShapeNet-Part DRNet Class Average IoU 83.7 #27 of 67 Archive leaderboard report
3D Part Segmentation ShapeNet-Part DRNet Instance Average IoU 86.4 #27 of 67 Archive leaderboard report
3D Point Cloud Classification ModelNet40 DRNet Overall Accuracy 93.1 #71 of 111 Archive leaderboard report
3D Point Cloud Classification ScanObjectNN DRNet Mean Accuracy 78.0 #71 of 77 Archive leaderboard report
3D Point Cloud Classification ScanObjectNN DRNet Overall Accuracy 80.3 #71 of 77 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections