Methods › General › Interpretability › Network Dissection

Network Dissection

11 papers tagged archive 2025-07-28

Introduced by Bolei Zhou et al. in Interpreting Deep Visual Representations via Network Dissection

archive 2025-07-28 Description, source and code snippet are the archive's method entry.

Network Dissection is an interpretability method for CNNs that evaluates the alignment between individual hidden units and a set of visual semantic concepts. By identifying the best alignments, units are given human interpretable labels across a range of objects, parts, scenes, textures, materials, and colors.

The measurement of interpretability proceeds in three steps:

PaperSource

Papers archive 2025-07-28

11 shown of 11, newest first. Repository counts are the archive's code-links table. A Syntology line states what Syntology ran from that paper's harvested code; it is per sample and not a correctness claim.

Tasks archive 2025-07-28

16 tasks the archive attaches to papers tagged with this method, by distinct papers. A task without a page in the catalog is plain text.

TaskPapers
Adversarial Defense1
Adversarial Robustness1
Attribute1
Classification1
Decision Making1
General Classification1
Image Classification1
Image Generation1
Image Retrieval1
Knowledge Distillation1
Object1
Object Detection1
Retrieval1
Segmentation1
image-classification1
object-detection1

Usage over time archive 2025-07-28

Papers per year tagged with Network Dissection: 2017 to 2023, peak 3 3 0 2017: 1 paper 2017 2018: 2 papers 2018 2019: 3 papers 2019 2020: 0 papers 2020 2021: 2 papers 2021 2022: 0 papers 2022 2023: 3 papers 2023
Papers per year the archive tags with this method, by the paper's archive date (11 dated). Bars are counts, not a trend claim.

Components: the archive holds no method-to-method composition, so PwC's Components table cannot be rebuilt; the Papers list carries no Results column for the same reason (the archive does not join its leaderboard rows to method tags).

Categories archive 2025-07-28

Interpretability

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections