Methods › Reinforcement Learning › Off-Policy TD Control › Expected Sarsa

Expected Sarsa

9 papers tagged archive 2025-07-28

archive 2025-07-28 Description, source and code snippet are the archive's method entry.

Expected Sarsa is like Q-learning but instead of taking the maximum over next state-action pairs, we use the expected value, taking into account how likely each action is under the current policy.

Q(Sₜ, Aₜ) ←Q(Sₜ, Aₜ) + α[Rₜ₊₁ + γ∑ₐπ(a|Sₜ₊₁)Q(Sₜ₊₁, a) - Q(Sₜ, Aₜ)]

Except for this change to the update rule, the algorithm otherwise follows the scheme of Q-learning. It is more computationally expensive than Sarsa but it eliminates the variance due to the random selection of Aₜ₊₁.

Source: Sutton and Barto, Reinforcement Learning, 2nd Edition

Papers archive 2025-07-28

9 shown of 9, newest first. Repository counts are the archive's code-links table. A Syntology line states what Syntology ran from that paper's harvested code; it is per sample and not a correctness claim.

Tasks archive 2025-07-28

7 tasks the archive attaches to papers tagged with this method, by distinct papers. A task without a page in the catalog is plain text.

TaskPapers
Reinforcement Learning (RL)8
reinforcement-learning7
Reinforcement Learning6
Q-Learning4
Board Games1
Card Games1
Deep Reinforcement Learning1

Usage over time archive 2025-07-28

Papers per year tagged with Expected Sarsa: 2017 to 2025, peak 2 2 0 2017: 1 paper 2017 2018: 1 paper 2018 2019: 0 papers 2019 2020: 2 papers 2020 2021: 1 paper 2021 2022: 2 papers 2022 2023: 0 papers 2023 2024: 0 papers 2024 2025: 2 papers 2025
Papers per year the archive tags with this method, by the paper's archive date (9 dated). Bars are counts, not a trend claim.

Components: the archive holds no method-to-method composition, so PwC's Components table cannot be rebuilt; the Papers list carries no Results column for the same reason (the archive does not join its leaderboard rows to method tags).

Categories archive 2025-07-28

Off-Policy TD ControlOn-Policy TD Control

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections