Datasets › CNN/Daily Mail › Papers where code ran, page 1

CNN/Daily Mail

Papers archive 2025-07-28

papers with a benchmark row: 89 · with a code link: 63 · where Syntology ran a sample: 30 (24 with a run with no instrument failure, 6 where every run was a failure of Syntology's instrument) Syntology

Show: all papers with a benchmark rowonly where code ran (30 of 89 with a benchmark row: 24 with a run with no instrument failure, 6 where every run was a failure of Syntology's instrument)

Syntology We ran code from the paper's repository; we did not run it on this dataset or check it against this dataset's benchmarks.

Page 1 of 1: papers 1 to 30 of the 30 papers with a benchmark row here where Syntology ran at least one harvested sample (24 with a run with no instrument failure, 6 where every run was a failure of Syntology's instrument), newest first by the archive's date (ties by arXiv id). This is a filter on Syntology's record ordered by date only, not a ranking; a run is not a correctness claim. A paper missing from this list is not a recorded non-run: it may have no arXiv id, no harvested code, or only samples that have not run yet.

The archive's own "papers using this dataset" list was never published, so this is the benchmark-backed subset, not that list; the archive's count for this dataset is 530. The Syntology column is from Syntology's graph, stated per sample; it is not part of any archive number. A line reads “N ran (of which C constructed an object rather than computing a result; K with no instrument failure: H honoured, V violated, P with no contract checked; I where Syntology's instrument failed) · U unverified” (C is a part of N, never taken away from it); the figure “where Syntology's instrument failed” counts failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized fixture, not that the paper's result was reproduced. When the archive marks a repository official for the paper, the cell starts with that repository's state (the archive's flag, not a verdict on who wrote the code; “community repositories only” when every sample that ran came from a community repository, “official: no sample here; runs from other or unrecorded repositories” when some came from a repository the paper names or has in its text, or from none recorded); hover it for the repositories the samples that ran came from. Syntology's record for this page has not changed since 2026-09-28, the first build that kept a record date for it; when this build read Syntology's graph is in the build record.