Papers › BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation,...
BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehension
Mike Lewis, Yinhan Liu, Naman Goyal, Marjan Ghazvininejad, Abdel-rahman Mohamed, Omer Levy, Ves Stoyanov, Luke Zettlemoyer
We present BART, a denoising autoencoder for pretraining sequence-to-sequence models. BART is trained by (1) corrupting text with an arbitrary noising function, and (2) learning a model to reconstruct the original text. It uses a standard Tranformer-based neural machine translation architecture which, despite its simplicity, can be seen as generalizing BERT (due to the bidirectional encoder), GPT (with the left-to-right decoder), and many other more recent pretraining schemes. We evaluate a number of noising approaches, finding the best performance by both randomly shuffling the order of the original sentences and using a novel in-filling scheme, where spans of text are replaced with a single mask token. BART is particularly effective when fine tuned for text generation but also works well for comprehension tasks. It matches the performance of RoBERTa with comparable training resources on GLUE and SQuAD, achieves new state-of-the-art results on a range of abstractive dialogue, question answering, and summarization tasks, with gains of up to 6 ROUGE. BART also provides a 1.1 BLEU increase over a back-translation system for machine translation, with only target language pretraining. We also report ablation experiments that replicate other pretraining schemes within the BART framework, to better measure which factors most influence end-task performance.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="1910.13461")
Code
Syntology Ran 22 of 53 code samples harvested from 9 repositories linked to this paper; 31 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract; 1 ran · violated contract; 7 ran · our draft was wrong; 1 ran · fixture could not drive it; 12 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: community (archive-listed): 53 samples from 9 repositories, 22 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
47 repositories listed; official and paper-mentioned ones first.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
53 samples harvested; 22 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 31 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 7 of the 53 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from 9 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
425f7a153da6ce1c · report
e9a610ec98650659 · report
e01d62d03dcd9ca4 · report
54be1be200dfeae7 · report
7dd81fe3cbe34bdb · report
ff3f2f670826701f · report
a38901f69351322f · report
ff8c2ca593924bd0 · report
390e7ee6a89b3db0 · report
61295902b9488656 · report
8d77347cfa15b834 · report
d43a426d78c2dacb · report
47a59a0b45c916c8 · report
070b5bdeecd71825 · report
874a42377fa0659f · report
899d1e2736236351 · report
f20c9b1aead27fea · report
548c3509c23676c4 · report
e00ccf7847d12b59 · report
8eadeed331b841fc · report
0dc219ab6716a127 · report
4ac94d84c40c32cb · report
f05aeb96d74a93ac · report
a8821d279d5c47ec · report
81708af0925e3ecb · report
a70369f5e1d4f10b · report
0f787d1f3f22c2bc · report
a47f8c473e362e5a · report
6af3a69713d1961b · report
5a651b6ef42f5d35 · report
20157e68a194d015 · report
6b81c6ad0d553004 · report
2d3ccf3606eee8d7 · report
03c622fbd053b445 · report
e3c82cdc2062e229 · report
9b6e878d15f549bc · report
6c663245fb8a9853 · report
2f97d78f96ebf790 · report
e2635b61a3c6c441 · report
d46c1839e7291c3f · report
5d81e0ebf38a1261 · report
350f2fc5631039a2 · report
8b437b06f0647a87 · report
05809fee3ec27f95 · report
52e211fe8bfc51fe · report
718d6d148c2907ad · report
e683aae8732f6e92 · report
cc1fd572c2800793 · report
13594c848a4f3848 · report
1d119e078734e42d · report
d0a738e3442f47f8 · report
5ab962d0a8a909a1 · report
67aa808378a82feb · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abstractive Text Summarization | CNN / Daily Mail | BART | ROUGE-1 | 44.16 | #19 of 53 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Abstractive Text Summarization | CNN / Daily Mail | BART | ROUGE-2 | 21.28 | #19 of 53 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Abstractive Text Summarization | CNN / Daily Mail | BART | ROUGE-L | 40.90 | #19 of 53 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Open-Domain Question Answering | ELI5 | BART | Rouge-1 | 30.6 | #3 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Open-Domain Question Answering | ELI5 | BART | Rouge-2 | 6.2 | #3 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Open-Domain Question Answering | ELI5 | BART | Rouge-L | 24.3 | #3 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Question Answering | SQuAD1.1 dev | BART Base (with text infilling) | F1 | 90.8 | #52 of 55 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Text Summarization | X-Sum | BART | ROUGE-1 | 45.14 | #7 of 18 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Text Summarization | X-Sum | BART | ROUGE-2 | 22.27 | #7 of 18 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Text Summarization | X-Sum | BART | ROUGE-3 | 37.25 | #7 of 18 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Introduced by this paper: BART
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections