Browse State-of-the-Art › Propaganda detection
Propaganda detection
15 papers with code · 0 benchmarks · 1 dataset archive 2025-07-28
Benchmarks archive 2025-07-28
No benchmark for this task in the archive.
Libraries
Not in the archive: the export carries no per-task library table, so there is nothing to show at snapshot 2025-07-28.
Datasets archive 2025-07-28
1 dataset whose archive record lists this task, ordered by the archive's paper count.
Subtasks archive 2025-07-28
2 subtasks in the archive's task tree.
Most implemented papers archive 2025-07-28
15 shown of 15 papers with code (61 tagged with this task in all), ordered by repositories listed in the archive, not by stars (the archive holds no stars, so PwC's “Social” and “Latest” sorts cannot be reproduced). Papers without a page here are shown as plain text.
-
10 Oct 2023 2 repositories listedWe evaluate the models' performance by assessing metrics such as F1 score, Precision, and Recall, comparing the results with the current state-of-the-art approach using RoBERTa.
-
3 Jan 2022 2 repositories listedDetecting and labeling stance in social media text is strongly motivated by hate speech detection, poll prediction, engagement forecasting, and concerted propaganda detection.
-
8 Aug 2024 1 repository listedThen, we used AraBERT-base pre-trained model for Arabic text tokenization and embeddings with a token classification layer to identify propaganda techniques.
-
16 Nov 2023 1 repository listedFinally, we examine the effectiveness of labels provided by GPT-4 in training smaller language models for the task.
-
23 May 2023 1 repository listedYet, it is common to find a mix of multiple languages in social media communication, a phenomenon known as code-switching.
-
28 Apr 2023 1 repository listed(2) We show empirically that state-of-the-art language models fail in detecting online propaganda when trained with weak labels (AUC: 64.
-
12 Dec 2022 1 repository listedOur three-stage framework natively consolidates prior datasets and methods from existing tasks, like propaganda detection, serving as an overarching evaluation testbed.
-
31 Oct 2022 1 repository listedIn addition to finding the techniques, Subtask 2 further asks to identify the textual span for each instance of each technique that is present in the tweet; the task can be modeled as a sequence tagging problem.
-
11 Apr 2022 1 repository listedWe present ProtoTEx, a novel white-box NLP classification architecture based on prototype networks.
-
14 Jun 2021 1 repository listedThe digital media, identified as computational propaganda provides a pathway for propaganda to expand its reach without limit.
-
24 Aug 2020 1 repository listed Syntology ran 0 of 2 samples · 2 unverifiedThis paper also compares the performances of different deep learning model architectures, such as the Bi-LSTM, LSTM, BERT, and XGBoost models, on the detection of news promotion techniques.
-
22 Aug 2020 1 repository listedThe article describes a fast solution to propaganda detection at SemEval-2020 Task 11, based onfeature adjustment.
-
22 Aug 2020 1 repository listedThis paper describes our participation in the SemEval-2020 task Detection of Propaganda Techniques in News Articles.
-
16 Mar 2020 1 repository listedThe automatic identification of propaganda has gained significance in recent years due to technological and social changes in the way news is generated and consumed.
-
16 Feb 2020 1 repository listedSubjective bias detection is critical for applications like propaganda detection, content recommendation, sentiment analysis, and bias neutralization.
Syntology lines on 1 of the papers shown; no Syntology record for the others (a paper without an arXiv id cannot be joined to the graph, and absence from the graph layer is not a recorded non-run). “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized fixture, not that the paper's result was reproduced. Read from the graph 2026-09-24.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections