Browse State-of-the-Art › Personalized Federated Learning

Personalized Federated Learning

117 papers with code · 7 benchmarks · 5 datasets archive 2025-07-28

AdversarialMethodology

The federated learning setup presents numerous challenges including data heterogeneity (differences in data distribution), device heterogeneity (in terms of computation capabilities, network connection, etc.), and communication efficiency. Especially data heterogeneity makes it hard to learn a single shared global model that applies to all clients. To overcome these issues, Personalized Federated Learning (PFL) aims to personalize the global model for each client in the federation.

Description from the archive archive 2025-07-28.

Benchmarks archive 2025-07-28

7 leaderboard tables shown for this task, 7 with rows (a “benchmark” on this site is a table with at least one row, as on /sota), ordered by row count. “Best model” is the first row in the archive's own order at snapshot; nothing is re-ranked here and metric direction is not recorded in the archive. PwC's Trend sparklines are not in the archive, so that column is omitted.

DatasetBest model (first row in archive order)PaperCodeSyntologyCompare
CIFAR-10 (7 rows) pFedHN-PC Personalized Federated Learning using Hypernetworks code — Compare
CIFAR-100 (7 rows) pFedGP-IP-data Personalized Federated Learning with Gaussian Processes code — Compare
Shakespeare (2 rows) SuPerFed-MM Connecting Low-Loss Subspace for Personalized Federated Learning code Syntology ran 0 of 2 samples · 2 unverified Compare
FEMNIST (2 rows) SuPerFed-MM Connecting Low-Loss Subspace for Personalized Federated Learning code Syntology ran 0 of 2 samples · 2 unverified Compare
MNIST (2 rows) SuPerFed-LM Connecting Low-Loss Subspace for Personalized Federated Learning code Syntology ran 0 of 2 samples · 2 unverified Compare
Omniglot (2 rows) pFedHN-PC Personalized Federated Learning using Hypernetworks code — Compare
Tiny ImageNet (2 rows) SuPerFed-MM Connecting Low-Loss Subspace for Personalized Federated Learning code Syntology ran 0 of 2 samples · 2 unverified Compare

Syntology column: samples harvested from the paper's repositories and executed on synthesized fixtures; “ran” is not a correctness claim and does not order the table. A dash means no Syntology record for that paper, not a recorded non-run. Read from the graph 2026-09-24.

Libraries

Not in the archive: the export carries no per-task library table, so there is nothing to show at snapshot 2025-07-28.

Datasets archive 2025-07-28

5 datasets whose archive record lists this task, ordered by the archive's paper count.

Subtasks archive 2025-07-28

No subtask under this task in the archive's task tree.

Parent tasks archive 2025-07-28

Most implemented papers archive 2025-07-28

30 shown of 117 papers with code (311 tagged with this task in all), ordered by repositories listed in the archive, not by stars (the archive holds no stars, so PwC's “Social” and “Latest” sorts cannot be reproduced). Papers without a page here are shown as plain text.

Syntology lines on 17 of the papers shown; no Syntology record for the others (a paper without an arXiv id cannot be joined to the graph, and absence from the graph layer is not a recorded non-run). “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized fixture, not that the paper's result was reproduced. Read from the graph 2026-09-24.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections