Browse State-of-the-Art › Multimodal Text Prediction
Multimodal Text Prediction
1 paper with code · 1 benchmark · 2 datasets archive 2025-07-28
Multimodal text prediction is a type of natural language processing that involves predicting the next word or sequence of words in a sentence, given multiple modalities or types of input. In traditional text prediction, the prediction is based solely on the context of the sentence, such as the words that precede the target word. In multimodal text prediction, additional modalities, such as images, audio, or user behavior, are also used to inform the prediction.
For example, in a multimodal text prediction system for captioning images, the system may use both the content of the image and the words that have been typed so far to generate the next word in the caption. The image may provide additional context or information about the content of the caption, while the typed words may provide information about the style or tone of the caption.
Multimodal text prediction can be achieved using a variety of techniques, including deep learning models and statistical models. These models can be trained on large datasets of text and multimodal inputs to learn the relationships between the different types of data and improve the accuracy of the predictions.
Multimodal text prediction has many applications, including chatbots, virtual assistants, and predictive text input for mobile devices. By incorporating additional modalities into the prediction process, multimodal text prediction systems can provide more accurate and useful predictions, improving the overall user experience.
Description from the archive archive 2025-07-28.
Benchmarks archive 2025-07-28
1 leaderboard table shown for this task, 1 with rows (a “benchmark” on this site is a table with at least one row, as on /sota), ordered by row count. “Best model” is the first row in the archive's own order at snapshot; nothing is re-ranked here and metric direction is not recorded in the archive. PwC's Trend sparklines are not in the archive, so that column is omitted.
| Dataset | Best model (first row in archive order) | Paper | Code | Syntology | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MultiSubs (1 row) | 9-gram LM with back-off | MultiSubs: A Large-scale Multimodal and Multilingual Dataset | code | — | Compare |
Syntology column: samples harvested from the paper's repositories and executed on synthesized fixtures; “ran” is not a correctness claim and does not order the table. A dash means no Syntology record for that paper, not a recorded non-run. Read from the graph 2026-09-24.
Libraries
Not in the archive: the export carries no per-task library table, so there is nothing to show at snapshot 2025-07-28.
Datasets archive 2025-07-28
2 datasets whose archive record lists this task, ordered by the archive's paper count.
Subtasks archive 2025-07-28
No subtask under this task in the archive's task tree.
Most implemented papers archive 2025-07-28
1 shown of 1 paper with code (1 tagged with this task in all), ordered by repositories listed in the archive, not by stars (the archive holds no stars, so PwC's “Social” and “Latest” sorts cannot be reproduced). Papers without a page here are shown as plain text.
-
2 Mar 2021 1 repository listedThe dataset will benefit research on visual grounding of words especially in the context of free-form sentences, and can be obtained from https://doi.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections