Browse State-of-the-Art › Metadata quality
Metadata quality
3 papers with code · 0 benchmarks · 0 datasets archive 2025-07-28
This task consists of the automatic assessment of the quality of the metadata of an information system.
Description from the archive archive 2025-07-28.
Benchmarks archive 2025-07-28
No benchmark for this task in the archive.
Libraries
Not in the archive: the export carries no per-task library table, so there is nothing to show at snapshot 2025-07-28.
Datasets archive 2025-07-28
No dataset record in the archive lists this task.
Subtasks archive 2025-07-28
No subtask under this task in the archive's task tree.
Most implemented papers archive 2025-07-28
3 shown of 3 papers with code (7 tagged with this task in all), ordered by repositories listed in the archive, not by stars (the archive holds no stars, so PwC's “Social” and “Latest” sorts cannot be reproduced). Papers without a page here are shown as plain text.
-
12 May 2025 1 repository listedAccurate affiliation matching, which links affiliation strings to standardized organization identifiers, is critical for improving research metadata quality, facilitating comprehensive bibliometric analyses, and…
-
28 Jul 2023 1 repository listedData catalogs play a crucial role in modern data-driven organizations by facilitating the discovery, understanding, and utilization of diverse data assets.
-
30 Mar 2023 1 repository listedMetadata quality is crucial for digital objects to be discovered through digital library interfaces.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections