Browse State-of-the-Art › Constituency Parsing

Constituency Parsing

81 papers with code · 4 benchmarks · 6 datasets archive 2025-07-28

Natural Language Processing

Constituency parsing aims to extract a constituency-based parse tree from a sentence that represents its syntactic structure according to a phrase structure grammar.

Example:

             Sentence (S)
                 |
   +-------------+------------+
   |                          |
 Noun (N)                Verb Phrase (VP)
   |                          |
 John                 +-------+--------+
                      |                |
                    Verb (V)         Noun (N)
                      |                |
                    sees              Bill

Recent approaches convert the parse tree into a sequence following a depth-first traversal in order to be able to apply sequence-to-sequence models to it. The linearized version of the above parse tree looks as follows: (S (N) (VP V N)).

Description from the archive archive 2025-07-28.

Benchmarks archive 2025-07-28

4 leaderboard tables shown for this task, 4 with rows (a “benchmark” on this site is a table with at least one row, as on /sota), ordered by row count. “Best model” is the first row in the archive's own order at snapshot; nothing is re-ranked here and metric direction is not recorded in the archive. PwC's Trend sparklines are not in the archive, so that column is omitted.

DatasetBest model (first row in archive order)PaperCodeSyntologyCompare
Penn Treebank (27 rows) Hashing + XLNet To be Continuous, or to be Discrete, Those are Bits of Questions code — Compare
CTB5 (9 rows) Attach-Juxtapose Parser + BERT Strongly Incremental Constituency Parsing with Graph Neural Networks code Syntology ran 2 of 5 samples · 3 unverified Compare
CTB7 (3 rows) CRF Parser + Electra Fast and Accurate Neural CRF Constituency Parsing code Syntology ran 3 of 3 samples · 0 unverified Compare
ATB (1 row) SAPar Improving Constituency Parsing with Span Attention code Syntology ran 1 of 1 samples · 0 unverified Compare

Syntology column: samples harvested from the paper's repositories and executed on synthesized fixtures; “ran” is not a correctness claim and does not order the table. A dash means no Syntology record for that paper, not a recorded non-run. Read from the graph 2026-09-24.

Libraries

Not in the archive: the export carries no per-task library table, so there is nothing to show at snapshot 2025-07-28.

Datasets archive 2025-07-28

6 datasets whose archive record lists this task, ordered by the archive's paper count.

Subtasks archive 2025-07-28

1 subtask in the archive's task tree.

Most implemented papers archive 2025-07-28

30 shown of 81 papers with code (204 tagged with this task in all), ordered by repositories listed in the archive, not by stars (the archive holds no stars, so PwC's “Social” and “Latest” sorts cannot be reproduced). Papers without a page here are shown as plain text.

Syntology lines on 18 of the papers shown; no Syntology record for the others (a paper without an arXiv id cannot be joined to the graph, and absence from the graph layer is not a recorded non-run). “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized fixture, not that the paper's result was reproduced. Read from the graph 2026-09-24.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections