Browse State-of-the-Art › Claim Extraction with Stance Classification (CESC)
Claim Extraction with Stance Classification (CESC)
1 paper with code · 1 benchmark · 2 datasets archive 2025-07-28
Since claims stand at a clear position towards a given topic, the sentences with clear stances should have a higher possibility to be the claims. Hence, identifying the stances of the claims is supposed to benefit the claim extraction task. By combining the claim extraction and stance classification subtasks, we define this integrated task as: given a specific topic and relevant articles, extract the claims from the articles and also identify the stance of the claims towards the topic.
Description from the archive archive 2025-07-28.
Benchmarks archive 2025-07-28
1 leaderboard table shown for this task, 1 with rows (a “benchmark” on this site is a table with at least one row, as on /sota), ordered by row count. “Best model” is the first row in the archive's own order at snapshot; nothing is re-ranked here and metric direction is not recorded in the archive. PwC's Trend sparklines are not in the archive, so that column is omitted.
| Dataset | Best model (first row in archive order) | Paper | Code | Syntology | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IAM Dataset (1 row) | Multi-label | IAM: A Comprehensive and Large-Scale Dataset for Integrated... | code | — | Compare |
Syntology column: samples harvested from the paper's repositories and executed on synthesized fixtures; “ran” is not a correctness claim and does not order the table. A dash means no Syntology record for that paper, not a recorded non-run. Read from the graph 2026-09-24.
Libraries
Not in the archive: the export carries no per-task library table, so there is nothing to show at snapshot 2025-07-28.
Datasets archive 2025-07-28
2 datasets whose archive record lists this task, ordered by the archive's paper count.
Subtasks archive 2025-07-28
No subtask under this task in the archive's task tree.
Parent tasks archive 2025-07-28
Most implemented papers archive 2025-07-28
1 shown of 1 paper with code (2 tagged with this task in all), ordered by repositories listed in the archive, not by stars (the archive holds no stars, so PwC's “Social” and “Latest” sorts cannot be reproduced). Papers without a page here are shown as plain text.
-
23 Mar 2022 1 repository listedTraditionally, a debate usually requires a manual preparation process, including reading plenty of articles, selecting the claims, identifying the stances of the claims, seeking the evidence for the claims, etc.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections