Papers › xDeepFM: Combining Explicit and Implicit Feature Interactions for Recommender Systems
xDeepFM: Combining Explicit and Implicit Feature Interactions for Recommender Systems
Jianxun Lian, Xiaohuan Zhou, Fuzheng Zhang, Zhongxia Chen, Xing Xie, Guangzhong Sun
Combinatorial features are essential for the success of many commercial models. Manually crafting these features usually comes with high cost due to the variety, volume and velocity of raw data in web-scale systems. Factorization based models, which measure interactions in terms of vector product, can learn patterns of combinatorial features automatically and generalize to unseen features as well. With the great success of deep neural networks (DNNs) in various fields, recently researchers have proposed several DNN-based factorization model to learn both low- and high-order feature interactions. Despite the powerful ability of learning an arbitrary function from data, plain DNNs generate feature interactions implicitly and at the bit-wise level. In this paper, we propose a novel Compressed Interaction Network (CIN), which aims to generate feature interactions in an explicit fashion and at the vector-wise level. We show that the CIN share some functionalities with convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and recurrent neural networks (RNNs). We further combine a CIN and a classical DNN into one unified model, and named this new model eXtreme Deep Factorization Machine (xDeepFM). On one hand, the xDeepFM is able to learn certain bounded-degree feature interactions explicitly; on the other hand, it can learn arbitrary low- and high-order feature interactions implicitly. We conduct comprehensive experiments on three real-world datasets. Our results demonstrate that xDeepFM outperforms state-of-the-art models. We have released the source code of xDeepFM at \url{https://github.com/Leavingseason/xDeepFM}.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="1803.05170")
Code
Syntology Ran 3 of 15 code samples harvested from 4 repositories linked to this paper; 12 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 2 ran · honoured contract; 1 ran · our draft was wrong.
By repository: community (archive-listed): 15 samples from 4 repositories, 3 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
19 repositories listed; official and paper-mentioned ones first.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
15 samples harvested; 3 ran; 2 honoured the contract we drafted; 12 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 2 of the 15 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from 4 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
a5d2f1c9e119342a · report
626554fd98c853c6 · report
b4a378e17a8e73f3 · report
93cee4fc981be52d · report
c52cd7cbf859f8e0 · report
6ec04041da9444a4 · report
13a7876a5bb5d755 · report
4ade2988b393a443 · report
dde7d5bc564c9516 · report
a9c34e87754edb05 · report
26d562ddfce33be0 · report
fbf236cde152c63b · report
6e86b813e6449904 · report
8b17f7c92b0db3cd · report
6a132eb3e50b4c7f · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Click-Through Rate Prediction | Bing News | xDeepFM | AUC | 0.84 | #1 of 7 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Click-Through Rate Prediction | Bing News | xDeepFM | Log Loss | 0.2649 | #1 of 7 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Click-Through Rate Prediction | Bing News | DNN | AUC | 0.03 | #7 of 7 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Click-Through Rate Prediction | Bing News | DNN | Log Loss | 0.3382 | #7 of 7 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Click-Through Rate Prediction | Criteo | xDeepFM | AUC | 0.8052 | #29 of 39 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Click-Through Rate Prediction | Criteo | xDeepFM | Log Loss | 0.4418 | #29 of 39 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Click-Through Rate Prediction | Dianping | xDeepFM | AUC | 0.8639 | #1 of 5 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Click-Through Rate Prediction | Dianping | xDeepFM | Log Loss | 0.3156 | #1 of 5 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Click-Through Rate Prediction | Dianping | DNN | AUC | 0.8318 | #5 of 5 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Click-Through Rate Prediction | KKBox | xDeepFM | AUC | 0.8535 | #3 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections