Papers › Weighted Multi-Level Feature Factorization for App ads CTR and installation prediction

Weighted Multi-Level Feature Factorization for App ads CTR and installation prediction

3 Aug 2023arXiv:2308.02568archive 2025-07-28

Juan Manuel Rodriguez, Antonela Tommasel

This paper provides an overview of the approach we used as team ISISTANITOS for the ACM RecSys Challenge 2023. The competition was organized by ShareChat, and involved predicting the probability of a user clicking an app ad and/or installing an app, to improve deep funnel optimization and a special focus on user privacy. Our proposed method inferring the probabilities of clicking and installing as two different, but related tasks. Hence, the model engineers a specific set of features for each task and a set of shared features. Our model is called Weighted Multi-Level Feature Factorization because it considers the interaction of different order features, where the order is associated to the depth in a neural network. The prediction for a given task is generated by combining the task specific and shared features on the different levels. Our submission achieved the 11 rank and overall score of 55 in the competition academia-track final results. We release our source code at: https://github.com/knife982000/RecSys2023Challenge

PaperPDFCode

Code

knife982000/recsys2023challenge officialmentioned in paperpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Click-Through Rate PredictionRecommendation Systems

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Click-Through Rate Prediction Criteo WMLFF AUC 0.804 #30 of 39 Archive leaderboard report
Click-Through Rate Prediction Criteo WMLFF Log Loss 0.447 #30 of 39 Archive leaderboard report
Recommendation Systems MovieLens 100K WMLFF RMSE (u1 Splits) 0.928 #13 of 18 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

Focus

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections